Back to Search
Start Over
Siewert type I and II oesophageal adenocarcinoma: sensitivity/specificity of computed tomography, positron emission tomography and endoscopic ultrasound for assessment of lymph node metastases in groups of thoracic and abdominal lymph node stations.
- Source :
-
Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery [Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg] 2019 Apr 01; Vol. 28 (4), pp. 518-525. - Publication Year :
- 2019
-
Abstract
- Objectives: In Siewert type I/II oesophageal adenocarcinoma, the sensitivity and specificity of computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET)-CT and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for assessment of the N descriptor in defined groups of lymph nodes were investigated.<br />Methods: CT, PET/CT, EUS images and the pathological data of 101 oesophageal adenocarcinomas submitted to primary resection were compared. The lymph nodes were identified as (a) right paratracheal/subcarinal/pulmonary ligament; (b) paraoesophageal; (c) paracardial; (d) left gastric artery, lesser curvature; (e) coeliac trunk, hepatic/splenic artery.<br />Results: Of the 2451 lymph nodes identified, 273 (11.1%) were histologically positive. Overall sensitivity, specificity and negative and positive predictive value for detection of lymph nodes metastatic were respectively: CT sensitivity 39%, specificity 86%, negative 58% and positive 74% predictive value; PET/CT sensitivity 30%, specificity 98%, negative 58% and positive 93% predictive value; EUS sensitivity 50%, specificity 81%, negative 72% and positive 62% predictive value. The sensitivity of CT, PET/CT and EUS in the thoracic nodal groups (a) and (b) was, respectively, 58.3%, 7.1% and 87.5% and 33.3%, 20% and 80%. Sensitivity was below 47% for all tests in the abdominal nodal groups. In contrast, specificity (88.6-100%) was super imposable in all nodal groups. The strength of agreement among the 3 imaging techniques was poor (kappa < 0.30) for the thoracic anatomical groups of interest: (a) lower paratracheal/subcarinal/pulmonary ligament and (b) paraoesophageal; it was moderate/good (kappa >0.30) for the abdominal N groups of interest: c, d and e.<br />Conclusions: The diagnostic performance of CT, PET and EUS for assessing the N descriptor in the paracardial and abdominal stations close to the primary tumour is not satisfactory. EUS can efficiently assess the presence/absence of nodal metastases in the thoracic stations.<br />Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT03529968.<br /> (© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Adenocarcinoma surgery
Aged
Esophageal Neoplasms surgery
Female
Humans
Lymph Nodes pathology
Lymphatic Metastasis
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Sensitivity and Specificity
Adenocarcinoma diagnostic imaging
Adenocarcinoma pathology
Endosonography
Esophageal Neoplasms diagnostic imaging
Esophageal Neoplasms pathology
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1569-9285
- Volume :
- 28
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 30496443
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivy314