Back to Search
Start Over
Differences in fixation strength among constructs of atlantoaxial fixation.
- Source :
-
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine [J Neurosurg Spine] 2018 Oct 19; Vol. 30 (1), pp. 52-59. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Oct 19 (Print Publication: 2019). - Publication Year :
- 2018
-
Abstract
- OBJECTIVETo avoid jeopardizing an aberrant vertebral artery, there are three common options in placing a C2 screw, including pedicle, pars, and translaminar screws. Although biomechanical studies have demonstrated similar strength among these C2 screws in vitro, there are limited clinical data to address their differences in vivo. When different screws were placed in each side, few reports have compared the outcomes. The present study aimed to evaluate these multiple combinations of C2 screws.METHODSConsecutive adult patients who underwent posterior atlantoaxial (AA) fixation were retrospectively reviewed. Every patient uniformly had bilateral C1 lateral mass screws in conjunction with 2 C2 screws (1 C2 screw on each side chosen among the three options: pedicle, pars, or translaminar screws, based on individualized anatomical consideration). These patients were then grouped according to the different combinations of C2 screws for comparison of the outcomes.RESULTSA total of 63 patients were analyzed, with a mean follow-up of 34.3 months. There were five kinds of construct combinations of the C2 screws: 2 pedicle screws (the Ped-Ped group, n = 24), 2 translaminar screws (the La-La group, n = 7), 2 pars screws (the Pars-Pars group, n = 6), 1 pedicle and 1 pars screw (the Ped-Pars group, n = 7), and 1 pedicle and 1 translaminar screw (the Ped-La group, n = 19). The rate of successful fixation in each of the groups was 100%, 57.1%, 100%, 100%, and 78.9% (Ped-Ped, La-La, Par-Par, Ped-Par, and Ped-La, respectively). The patients who had no translaminar screw had a higher rate of success than those who had 1 or 2 translaminar screws (100% vs 73.1%, p = 0.0009). Among the 5 kinds of construct combinations, 2 C2 pedicle screws (the Ped-Ped group) had higher rates of success than 1 C2 pedicle and 1 C2 translaminar screw (the Ped-La group, p = 0.018). Overall, the rate of successful fixation was 87.3% (55/63). There were 7 patients (4 in the Ped-La group and 3 in the La-La group) who lost fixation/reduction, and they all had at least 1 translaminar screw.CONCLUSIONSIn AA fixation, C2 pedicle or pars screws or a combination of both provided very high success rates. Involvement of 1 or 2 C2 translaminar screws in the construct significantly lowered success rates. Therefore, a C2 pars screw is recommended over a translaminar screw.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Aged
Axis, Cervical Vertebra surgery
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications etiology
Postoperative Complications surgery
Range of Motion, Articular physiology
Retrospective Studies
Spinal Fusion methods
Atlanto-Axial Joint surgery
Cervical Vertebrae surgery
Joint Instability surgery
Vertebral Artery surgery
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1547-5646
- Volume :
- 30
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of neurosurgery. Spine
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 30485212
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.6.SPINE171390