Back to Search Start Over

Implications of micropapillary urothelial carcinoma variant on prognosis following radical cystectomy: A multi-institutional investigation.

Authors :
Mitra AP
Fairey AS
Skinner EC
Boorjian SA
Frank I
Schoenberg MP
Bivalacqua TJ
Hyndman ME
Reese AC
Steinberg GD
Large MC
Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA
Bruins HM
Daneshmand S
Source :
Urologic oncology [Urol Oncol] 2019 Jan; Vol. 37 (1), pp. 48-56. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Nov 13.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the association of micropapillary urothelial carcinoma (MUC) variant histology with bladder cancer outcomes after radical cystectomy.<br />Materials and Methods: Information on MUC patients treated with radical cystectomy was obtained from five academic centers. Data on 1,497 patients were assembled in a relational database. Tumor histology was categorized as urothelial carcinoma without any histological variants (UC; n = 1,346) or MUC (n = 151). Univariable and multivariable models were used to analyze associations with recurrence-free (RFS) and overall (OS) survival.<br />Results: Median follow-up was 10.0 and 7.8 years for the UC and MUC groups, respectively. No significant differences were noted between UC and MUC groups with regard to age, gender, clinical disease stage, and administration of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy (all, P ≥ 0.10). When compared with UC, presence of MUC was associated with higher pathologic stage (organ-confined, 60% vs. 27%; extravesical, 18% vs. 23%; node-positive, 22% vs. 50%; P < 0.01) and lymphovascular invasion (29% vs. 58%; P < 0.01) at cystectomy. In comparison with UC, MUC patients had poorer 5-year RFS (70% vs. 44%; P < 0.01) and OS (61% vs. 38%; P < 0.01). However, on multivariable analysis, tumor histology was not independently associated with the risks of recurrence (P = 0.27) or mortality (P = 0.12).<br />Conclusions: This multi-institutional analysis demonstrated that the presence of MUC was associated with locally advanced disease at radical cystectomy. However, clinical outcomes were comparable to those with pure UC after controlling for standard clinicopathologic predictors.<br /> (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1873-2496
Volume :
37
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Urologic oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30446450
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.10.013