Back to Search Start Over

Population-based birth defects data in the United States, 2011-2015: A focus on eye and ear defects.

Authors :
Stallings EB
Isenburg JL
Mai CT
Liberman RF
Moore CA
Canfield MA
Salemi JL
Kirby RS
Short TD
Nembhard WN
Forestieri NE
Heinke D
Alverson CJ
Romitti PA
Huynh MP
Denson LE
Judson EM
Lupo PJ
Source :
Birth defects research [Birth Defects Res] 2018 Nov 15; Vol. 110 (19), pp. 1478-1486. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Nov 16.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Background/objectives: In this data brief, we examine major eye and ear anomalies (anophthalmia/microphthalmia, anotia/microtia, and congenital cataract) for a recent 5-year birth cohort using data from 30 population-based birth defects surveillance programs in the United States.<br />Methods: As a special call for data for the 2018 NBDPN Annual Report, state programs reported expanded data on eye/ear anomalies for birth years 2011-2015. We calculated the combined overall prevalence (per 10,000 live births) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), for the three anomalies as well as by maternal age, maternal race/ethnicity, infant sex, laterality, presence/absence of other major birth defects, and case ascertainment methodology utilized by the program (active vs. passive).<br />Results: The overall prevalence estimate (per 10,000 live births) was 1.5 (95% CI: 1.4-1.5) for anophthalmia/microphthalmia, 1.5 (95% CI: 1.4-1.6) for congenital cataract, and 1.8 (95% CI: 1.7-1.8) for anotia/microtia. Congenital cataract prevalence varied little by maternal race/ethnicity, infant sex, or case ascertainment methodology; prevalence differences were more apparent across strata for anophthalmia/microphthalmia and anotia/microtia. Prevalence among active vs. passive ascertainment programs was 50% higher for anophthalmia/microphthalmia (1.9 vs. 1.2) and two-fold higher for anotia/microtia (2.6 vs. 1.2). Anophthalmia/microphthalmia was more likely than other conditions to co-occur with other birth defects. All conditions were more frequent among older mothers (40+ years).<br />Conclusions: This data brief provides recent prevalence estimates for anophthalmia/microphthalmia, congenital cataract, and anotia/microtia that address a data gap by examining pooled data from 30 population-based surveillance systems, covering a five-year birth cohort of about 12.4 million births.<br /> (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2472-1727
Volume :
110
Issue :
19
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Birth defects research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30444307
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/bdr2.1413