Cite
A perioperative surgeon-controlled open-lung approach versus conventional protective ventilation with low positive end-expiratory pressure in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (PROVECS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
MLA
Lagier, David, et al. “A Perioperative Surgeon-Controlled Open-Lung Approach versus Conventional Protective Ventilation with Low Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Cardiac Surgery with Cardiopulmonary Bypass (PROVECS): Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.” Trials, vol. 19, no. 1, Nov. 2018, p. 624. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2967-y.
APA
Lagier, D., Fischer, F., Fornier, W., Fellahi, J.-L., Colson, P., Cholley, B., Jaber, S., Baumstarck, K., & Guidon, C. (2018). A perioperative surgeon-controlled open-lung approach versus conventional protective ventilation with low positive end-expiratory pressure in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (PROVECS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials, 19(1), 624. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2967-y
Chicago
Lagier, David, François Fischer, William Fornier, Jean-Luc Fellahi, Pascal Colson, Bernard Cholley, Samir Jaber, Karine Baumstarck, and Catherine Guidon. 2018. “A Perioperative Surgeon-Controlled Open-Lung Approach versus Conventional Protective Ventilation with Low Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Cardiac Surgery with Cardiopulmonary Bypass (PROVECS): Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.” Trials 19 (1): 624. doi:10.1186/s13063-018-2967-y.