Back to Search
Start Over
The effect of loss-limit reminders on gambling behavior: A real-world study of Norwegian gamblers.
- Source :
-
Journal of behavioral addictions [J Behav Addict] 2018 Dec 01; Vol. 7 (4), pp. 1056-1067. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Nov 12. - Publication Year :
- 2018
-
Abstract
- Background: Over the past two decades, problem gambling has become a public health issue and research from many countries indicates that a small but significant minority of individuals are problem gamblers. In Norway, the prevalence of problem gambling among adults is estimated to be just less than 1%. To help minimize the harm from gambling, the Norwegian government's gambling operator (Norsk Tipping) has introduced several responsible gambling initiatives to help protect players from developing gambling problems (e.g., limit-setting tools, voluntary self-exclusion, personalized feedback, etc.).<br />Aim: The aim of this study was to determine whether the receiving of personalized feedback exceeding 80% of a personally set monetary personal limit had an effect on subsequent playing behavior compared to those gamblers who did not receive personalized feedback.<br />Methods: Out of 54,002 players, a total of 7,884 players (14.5%) received at least one piece of feedback that they had exceeded 80% of their personal global monthly loss limit between January and March 2017.<br />Results: Using a matched-pairs design, results showed that those gamblers receiving personalized feedback in relation to limit-setting showed significant reductions in the amount of money gambled.<br />Conclusion: The findings of this study will be of great value to many stakeholder groups including researchers in the gambling studies field, the gambling industry, regulators, and policymakers.
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2063-5303
- Volume :
- 7
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of behavioral addictions
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 30418076
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.7.2018.106