Back to Search Start Over

A multicenter randomized trial comparing a 25-gauge EUS fine-needle aspiration device with a 20-gauge EUS fine-needle biopsy device.

Authors :
van Riet PA
Larghi A
Attili F
Rindi G
Nguyen NQ
Ruszkiewicz A
Kitano M
Chikugo T
Aslanian H
Farrell J
Robert M
Adeniran A
Van Der Merwe S
Roskams T
Chang K
Lin F
Lee JG
Arcidiacono PG
Petrone M
Doglioni C
Iglesias-Garcia J
Abdulkader I
Giovannini M
Bories E
Poizat F
Santo E
Scapa E
Marmor S
Bucobo JC
Buscaglia JM
Heimann A
Wu M
Baldaque-Silva F
Moro CF
Erler NS
Biermann K
Poley JW
Cahen DL
Bruno MJ
Source :
Gastrointestinal endoscopy [Gastrointest Endosc] 2019 Feb; Vol. 89 (2), pp. 329-339. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Oct 24.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background and Aims: Several studies have compared EUS-guided FNA with fine-needle biopsy (FNB), but none have proven superiority. We performed a multicenter randomized controlled trial to compare the performance of a commonly used 25-gauge FNA needle with a newly designed 20-gauge FNB needle.<br />Methods: Consecutive patients with a solid lesion were randomized in this international multicenter study between a 25-gauge FNA (EchoTip Ultra) or a 20-gauge FNB needle (ProCore). The primary endpoint was diagnostic accuracy for malignancy and the Bethesda classification (non-diagnostic, benign, atypical, malignant). Technical success, safety, and sample quality were also assessed. Multivariable and supplementary analyses were performed to adjust for confounders.<br />Results: A total of 608 patients were allocated to FNA (n = 306) or FNB (n = 302); 312 pancreatic lesions (51%), 147 lymph nodes (24%), and 149 other lesions (25%). Technical success rate was 100% for the 25-gauge FNA and 99% for the 20-gauge FNB needle (P = .043), with no differences in adverse events. The 20-gauge FNB needle outperformed 25-gauge FNA in terms of histologic yield (77% vs 44%, P < .001), accuracy for malignancy (87% vs 78%, P = .002) and Bethesda classification (82% vs 72%, P = .002). This was robust when corrected for indication, lesion size, number of passes, and presence of an on-site pathologist (odds ratio, 3.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.55-8.56; P = .004), and did not differ among centers (P = .836).<br />Conclusion: The 20-gauge FNB needle outperformed the 25-gauge FNA needle in terms of histologic yield and diagnostic accuracy. This benefit was irrespective of the indication and was consistent among participating centers, supporting the general applicability of our findings. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02167074.).<br /> (Copyright © 2019 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1097-6779
Volume :
89
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Gastrointestinal endoscopy
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30367877
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2018.10.026