Back to Search Start Over

FDG and FMISO PET-guided dose escalation with intensity-modulated radiotherapy in lung cancer.

Authors :
Thureau S
Dubray B
Modzelewski R
Bohn P
Hapdey S
Vincent S
Anger E
Gensanne D
Pirault N
Pierrick G
Vera P
Source :
Radiation oncology (London, England) [Radiat Oncol] 2018 Oct 23; Vol. 13 (1), pp. 208. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Oct 23.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Background: Concomitant chemo-radiotherapy is the reference treatment for non-resectable locally-advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Increasing radiotherapy total dose in the whole tumour volume has been shown to be deleterious. Functional imaging with positron emission tomography (PET/CT) offers the potential to identify smaller and biologically meaningful target volumes that could be irradiated with larger doses without compromising Organs At Risk (OAR) tolerance. This study investigated four scenarios, based on <superscript>18</superscript> FDG and <superscript>18</superscript> F-miso PET/CT, to delineate the target volumes and derive radiotherapy plans delivering up to 74Gy.<br />Method: Twenty-one NSCLC patients, selected from a prospective phase II trial, had <superscript>18</superscript> FDG- and <superscript>18</superscript> F-miso PET/CT before the start of radiotherapy and <superscript>18</superscript> FDG PET/CT during the radiotherapy (42Gy). The plans were based planned on a standard plan delivering 66 Gy (plan 1) and on three different boost strategies to deliver 74Gy total dose in pre-treatment <superscript>18</superscript> FDG hotspot (70% of SUV <subscript>max</subscript> ) (plan 2), pre-treatment <superscript>18</superscript> F-miso target (SUV <subscript>max</subscript>  > 1.4) (plan 3) and per-treatment <superscript>18</superscript> FDG residual (40% of SUV <subscript>max</subscript> ). (plan 4).<br />Results: The mean target volumes were 4.8 cc (± 1.1) for <superscript>18</superscript> FDG hotspot, 38.9 cc (± 14.5) for <superscript>18</superscript> F-miso and 36.0 cc (± 10.1) for per-treatment <superscript>18</superscript> FDG. In standard plan (66 Gy), the mean dose covering 95% of the PTV (D95%) were 66.5 (± 0.33), 66.1 (± 0.32) and 66.1 (± 0.32) Gy for <superscript>18</superscript> FDG hotspot, <superscript>18</superscript> F-miso and per-treatment <superscript>18</superscript> FDG. In scenario 2, the mean D95% was 72.5 (± 0.25) Gy in <superscript>18</superscript> FDG hotspot versus 67.9 (± 0.49) and 67.9 Gy (± 0.52) in <superscript>18</superscript> F-miso and per-treatment <superscript>18</superscript> FDG, respectively. In scenario 3, the mean D95% was 72.2 (± 0.27) Gy to <superscript>18</superscript> F-miso versus 70.4 (± 0.74) and 69.5Gy (± 0.74) for <superscript>18</superscript> FDG hotspot and per-treatment <superscript>18</superscript> FDG, respectively. In scenario 4, the mean D95% was 73.1 (± 0.3) Gy to <superscript>18</superscript> FDG per-treatment versus 71.9 (± 0.61) and 69.8 (± 0.61) Gy for <superscript>18</superscript> FDG hotspot and <superscript>18</superscript> F-miso, respectively. The dose/volume constraints to OARs were matched in all scenarios.<br />Conclusion: Escalated doses can be selectively planned in NSCLC target volumes delineated on <superscript>18</superscript> FDG and <superscript>18</superscript> F-miso PET/CT functional images. The most relevant strategy should be investigated in clinical trials.<br />Trial Registration: (RTEP5, NCT01576796 , registered 15 june 2012).

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1748-717X
Volume :
13
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Radiation oncology (London, England)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30352608
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1147-2