Back to Search Start Over

The economic burden of CIDP in the United States: A case-control study.

Authors :
Divino V
Mallick R
DeKoven M
Krishnarajah G
Source :
PloS one [PLoS One] 2018 Oct 23; Vol. 13 (10), pp. e0206205. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Oct 23 (Print Publication: 2018).
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Background: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is a rare neurological disorder of the peripheral nervous system. The economic burden of CIDP is not well understood.<br />Objectives: To assess the economic and clinical burden of CIDP and to compare the incremental burden relative to a matched control group without CIDP.<br />Methods: This retrospective case-control analysis was conducted using data from the IQVIA Real-World Data Adjudicated Claims. Adults newly diagnosed with CIDP between 7/1/2010 and 6/30/2014 were identified and direct matched to controls without CIDP. Baseline characteristics were assessed and compared over a 6-month pre-index period. Healthcare resource use, costs and clinical characteristics were assessed and compared over a 2-year follow-up. Total cost differences over the 2-year follow-up were compared between matched cohorts using a generalized estimating equation model.<br />Results: The final sample comprised a total of 790 cases matched to 790 controls. Over the 2-year follow-up, cases more frequently experienced neuropathic pain, back pain and osteoarthritis and more commonly utilized opioids, anti-convulsants and anti-depressants. Compared to controls, more cases had ≥1 hospitalization (26.2% vs. 9.0%), and cases had a higher mean number of outpatient prescription fills (62.8 vs. 32.0) and physician office visits (34.7 vs. 13.0) (all p<0.0001). Cases had 7.5x higher mean total costs ($116,330 vs. $15,586, p<0.0001). Important cost drivers were costs for outpatient ancillary, radiology and HCPCS drugs (mean $76,366 vs. $4,292) and costs for inpatient care (mean $16,357 vs. $2,862) (both p<0.0001). Among cases, CIDP therapy (inclusive of both outpatient pharmacy and medical claims) accounted for 51.2% of mean total costs. After further adjusting for baseline clinical characteristics, cases were associated with a 6.1x increase in total costs compared to controls (p<0.0001).<br />Conclusions: Our findings suggest a substantial clinical and economic burden among patients with CIDP relative to matched controls over a 2-year follow-up.<br />Competing Interests: This study was funded by CSL Behring. RM and GK are employees and shareholders of CSL Behring. VD and MD are employed by IQVIA, which received research funding from CSL Behring for this study. Our Competing Interests do not alter the authors’ adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1932-6203
Volume :
13
Issue :
10
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
PloS one
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30352101
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206205