Back to Search Start Over

Standardizing Laryngeal Cleft Evaluations: Reliability of the Interarytenoid Assessment Protocol.

Authors :
Coppess S
Padia R
Horn D
Parikh SR
Inglis A
Bly R
Dahl J
Dudley D
Johnson K
Source :
Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery [Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg] 2019 Mar; Vol. 160 (3), pp. 533-539. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Oct 16.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Objective: While the Benjamin-Inglis classification system is widely used to categorize laryngeal clefts, it does not clearly differentiate a type 1 cleft from normal anatomy, and there is no widely accepted or validated protocol for systematically evaluating interarytenoid mucosal height. We sought to propose the interarytenoid assessment protocol as a method to standardize the description of the interarytenoid anatomy and to test its reliability.<br />Study Design: Retrospective review of endoscopic videos.<br />Setting: Pediatric academic center.<br />Subjects and Methods: The interarytenoid assessment protocol comprises 4 steps for evaluation of the interarytenoid region relative to known anatomic landmarks in the supraglottis, glottis, and subglottis. Thirty consecutively selected videos of the protocol were reviewed by 4 otolaryngologists. The raters were blinded to identifying information, and the video order was randomized for each review. We assessed protocol completion times and calculated Cohen's linear-weighted κ coefficient between blinded expert raters and with the operating surgeon to evaluate interrater/intrarater reliability.<br />Results: Median age was 4.9 years (59 months; range, 1 month to 20 years). Median completion time was 144 seconds. Interrater and intrarater reliability showed substantial agreement (interrater κ = 0.71 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.55-0.87]; intrarater mean κ = 0.70 [95% CI, 0.59-0.92/rater 1, 0.47-0.85/rater 2]; P < .001). Comparing raters to the operating surgeon demonstrated substantial agreement (mean κ = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.31-0.79/rater 1, 0.48-0.89/rater 2; P < .001).<br />Conclusion: The interarytenoid assessment protocol appears reliable in describing interarytenoid anatomy. Rapid completion times and substantial interrater/intrarater reliability were demonstrated. Incorporation of this protocol may provide important steps toward improved standardization in the anatomic description of the interarytenoid region in pediatric dysphagia.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1097-6817
Volume :
160
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30322357
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599818806283