Sex Differences in Genetic Associations With Longevity.

Importance: Sex differences in genetic associations with human longevity remain largely unknown; investigations on this topic are important for individualized health care.
Objective: To explore sex differences in genetic associations with longevity.
Design Setting and Participants: This population-based case-control study used sex-specific genome-wide association study and polygenic risk score (PRS) analyses to examine sex differences in genetic associations with longevity. Five hundred sixty-four male and 1614 female participants older than 100 years were compared with a control group of 773 male and 1526 female individuals aged 40 to 64 years. All were Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Study participants with Han ethnicity who were recruited in 1998 and 2008 to 2014.
Main Outcomes and Measures: Sex-specific loci and pathways associated with longevity and PRS measures of joint effects of sex-specific loci.
Results: Eleven male-specific and 11 female-specific longevity loci ( P < 10 ^-5 ) and 35 male-specific and 25 female-specific longevity loci (10 ^-5 ≤ P < 10 ^-4 ) were identified. Each of these loci's associations with longevity were replicated in north and south regions of China in one sex but were not significant in the other sex ( P = .13-.97), and loci-sex interaction effects were significant ( P < .05). The associations of loci rs60210535 of the LINC00871 gene with longevity were replicated in Chinese women ( P = 9.0 × 10 ^-5 ) and US women ( P = 4.6 × 10 ^-5 ) but not significant in Chinese and US men. The associations of the loci rs2622624 of the ABCG2 gene were replicated in Chinese women ( P = 6.8 × 10 ^-5 ) and European women ( P = .003) but not significant in both Chinese and European men. Eleven male-specific pathways (inflammation and immunity genes) and 34 female-specific pathways (tryptophan metabolism and PGC-1α induced) were significantly associated with longevity ( P < .005; false discovery rate < 0.05). The PRS analyses demonstrated that sex-specific associations with longevity of the 4 exclusive groups of 11 male-specific and 11 female-specific loci ( P < 10 ^-5 ) and 35 male-specific and 25 female-specific loci (10 ^-5 ≤ P < 10 ^-4 ) were jointly replicated across north and south discovery and target samples. Analyses using the combined data set of north and south showed that these 4 groups of sex-specific loci were jointly and significantly associated with longevity in one sex ( P = 2.9 × 10 ^-70 to 1.3 × 10 ^-39 ) but not jointly significant in the other sex ( P = .11 to .70), while interaction effects between PRS and sex were significant ( P = 4.8 × 10 ^-50 to 1.2 × 10 ^-16 ).
Conclusion and Relevance: The sex differences in genetic associations with longevity are remarkable, but have been overlooked by previously published genome-wide association studies on longevity. This study contributes to filling this research gap and provides a scientific basis for further investigating effects of sex-specific genetic variants and their interactions with environment on healthy aging, which may substantially contribute to more effective and targeted individualized health care for male and female elderly individuals.
Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Bai reported grants from the Natural Science Foundation of China during the conduct of the study. Dr Ni reported grants from the National Basic Research Program of China during the conduct of the study. Dr Slagboom reported grants from government during the conduct of the study. Dr Gottschalk reported serving as a consultant for Zinfandel Pharmaceuticals Inc outside the submitted work and was supported by National Institute on Aging grant RO1 AG040370. No other disclosures were reported.