Cite
Comparison of coronary revascularization appropriateness for non-acute coronary syndrome cases under the 2017 update vs the 2012 appropriate use criteria.
MLA
Case, Brian C., et al. “Comparison of Coronary Revascularization Appropriateness for Non-Acute Coronary Syndrome Cases under the 2017 Update vs the 2012 Appropriate Use Criteria.” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions : Official Journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, vol. 93, no. 4, Mar. 2019, pp. 620–25. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27895.
APA
Case, B. C., Geiser, K. M., Torguson, R., Pichard, A. D., Satler, L. F., Waksman, R., & Ben-Dor, I. (2019). Comparison of coronary revascularization appropriateness for non-acute coronary syndrome cases under the 2017 update vs the 2012 appropriate use criteria. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions : Official Journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 93(4), 620–625. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27895
Chicago
Case, Brian C, Katherine M Geiser, Rebecca Torguson, Augusto D Pichard, Lowell F Satler, Ron Waksman, and Itsik Ben-Dor. 2019. “Comparison of Coronary Revascularization Appropriateness for Non-Acute Coronary Syndrome Cases under the 2017 Update vs the 2012 Appropriate Use Criteria.” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions : Official Journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions 93 (4): 620–25. doi:10.1002/ccd.27895.