Back to Search Start Over

Modifiable Failures in the Colorectal Cancer Screening Process and Their Association With Risk of Death.

Authors :
Doubeni CA
Fedewa SA
Levin TR
Jensen CD
Saia C
Zebrowski AM
Quinn VP
Rendle KA
Zauber AG
Becerra-Culqui TA
Mehta SJ
Fletcher RH
Schottinger J
Corley DA
Source :
Gastroenterology [Gastroenterology] 2019 Jan; Vol. 156 (1), pp. 63-74.e6. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Sep 27.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background & Aims: Colorectal cancer (CRC) deaths occur when patients do not receive screening or have inadequate follow-up of abnormal results or when the screening test fails. We have few data on the contribution of each to CRC-associated deaths or factors associated with these events.<br />Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients in the Kaiser Permanente Northern and Southern California systems (55-90 years old) who died of CRC from 2006 through 2012 and had ≥5 years of enrollment before diagnosis. We compared data from patients with those from a matched cohort of cancer-free patients in the same system. Receipt, results, indications, and follow-up of CRC tests in the 10-year period before diagnosis were obtained from electronic databases and chart audits.<br />Results: Of 1750 CRC deaths, 75.9% (n = 1328) occurred in patients who were not up to date in screening and 24.1% (n = 422) occurred in patients who were up to date. Failure to screen was associated with fewer visits to primary care physicians. Of 3486 cancer-free patients, 44.6% were up to date in their screening. Patients who were up to date in their screening had a lower risk of CRC death (odds ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.33-0.44). Failure to screen, or failure to screen at appropriate intervals, occurred in a 67.8% of patients who died of CRC vs 53.2% of cancer-free patients; failure to follow-up on abnormal results occurred in 8.1% of patients who died of CRC vs 2.2% of cancer-free patients. CRC death was associated with higher odds of failure to screen or failure to screen at appropriate intervals (odds ratio, 2.40; 95% confidence interval, 2.07-2.77) and failure to follow-up on abnormal results (odds ratio, 7.26; 95% confidence interval, 5.26-10.03).<br />Conclusions: Being up to date on screening substantially decreases the risk of CRC death. In 2 health care systems with high rates of screening, most people who died of CRC had failures in the screening process that could be rectified, such as failure to follow-up on abnormal findings; these significantly increased the risk for CRC death.<br /> (Copyright © 2019 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1528-0012
Volume :
156
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Gastroenterology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30268788
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2018.09.040