Back to Search
Start Over
S100A10 upregulation associates with poor prognosis in lung squamous cell carcinoma.
- Source :
-
Biochemical and biophysical research communications [Biochem Biophys Res Commun] 2018 Oct 28; Vol. 505 (2), pp. 466-470. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Sep 27. - Publication Year :
- 2018
-
Abstract
- S100A10 is one of the members of the S100 protein family and is a key plasminogen receptor. Its upregulation has been reported in many types of tumors. In lung cancer, an association between upregulation of S100A10 and poor prognoses has been reported only in adenocarcinoma. We pursued the possibility of significance in lung squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). We first examined S100A10 protein expression by immunohistochemistry in 120 primary resected lung SCCs; 33 (27.5%) tumors showed strong membranous-immunopositivity particularly at the invasive front, i.e., the cancer-cell surface in contact with the stroma. Expression levels were significantly associated with higher pathological TNM stage (P = 0.0119), tumor size (P = 0.0003), lymphatic invasion (P = 0.0005), lymph node metastasis (P = 0.0006), and poorer prognosis (P = 0.0064). Our present results suggest that high S100A10 expression of the lung SCC cells, particularly adjacent to stroma, plays an important role in tumor progression, probably caused by lymphatic invasion and nodal metastasis.<br /> (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Carcinoma, Squamous Cell mortality
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell pathology
Humans
Immunohistochemistry
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Lung Neoplasms mortality
Lung Neoplasms pathology
Prognosis
Up-Regulation
Annexin A2 metabolism
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell metabolism
Lung Neoplasms metabolism
S100 Proteins metabolism
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1090-2104
- Volume :
- 505
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Biochemical and biophysical research communications
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 30268496
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.09.118