Back to Search Start Over

Sugammadex hypersensitivity and underlying mechanisms: a randomised study of healthy non-anaesthetised volunteers.

Authors :
de Kam PJ
Nolte H
Good S
Yunan M
Williams-Herman DE
Burggraaf J
Kluft C
Adkinson NF
Cullen C
Skov PS
Levy JH
van den Dobbelsteen DJ
van Heumen ELGM
van Meel FCM
Glassner D
Woo T
Min KC
Peeters PAM
Source :
British journal of anaesthesia [Br J Anaesth] 2018 Oct; Vol. 121 (4), pp. 758-767. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Jul 13.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Background: We investigated potential for hypersensitivity reactions after repeated sugammadex administration and explored the mechanism of hypersensitivity.<br />Methods: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study (NCT00988065), 448 healthy volunteers were randomised to one of three arms to receive three repeat i.v. administrations of either sugammadex 4 mg kg <superscript>-1</superscript> , 16 mg kg <superscript>-1</superscript> , or placebo. Primary endpoint was percentage of subjects with hypersensitivity (assessed by an independent adjudication committee). Secondary endpoint of anaphylaxis was classified per Sampson and Brighton criteria. Exploratory endpoints included skin testing, serum tryptase, anti-sugammadex antibodies [immunoglobulin (Ig) E/IgG], and other immunologic parameters.<br />Results: Hypersensitivity was adjudicated for 1/148 (0.7%), 7/150 (4.7%), and 0/150 (0.0%) subjects after sugammadex 4 mg kg <superscript>-1</superscript> , 16 mg kg <superscript>-1</superscript> , and placebo, respectively. After sugammadex 16 mg kg <superscript>-1</superscript> , one subject met Sampson criterion 1 and Brighton level 1 (highest certainty) anaphylaxis criteria; two met Brighton level 2 criteria. After database lock it was determined that certain protocol deviations could have introduced bias in the reporting of hypersensitivity signs/symptoms in a subject subset. Objective laboratory investigations indicated that potential underlying hypersensitivity mechanisms were unlikely to have been activated; the results suggest that most of the observed hypersensitivity reactions were unlikely IgE/IgG-mediated.<br />Conclusion: Dose-dependent hypersensitivity or anaphylaxis reactions to sugammadex were observed when administered without prior neuromuscular blocking agent. Laboratory investigations do not suggest prevalent allergen-specific IgE/IgG-mediated immunologic hypersensitivity. Because it could not be fully excluded that estimates of hypersensitivity/anaphylaxis incidence were unbiased, an additional study was conducted to characterise the potential for hypersensitivity reactions and is described in a companion report.<br />Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00988065; Protocol number P06042.<br /> (Copyright © 2018 British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1471-6771
Volume :
121
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
British journal of anaesthesia
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30236238
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2018.05.057