Back to Search Start Over

Borderline Q-waves in individuals without overt cardiovascular disease: Relations with adiposity, subclinical atherosclerosis and vascular stiffness.

Authors :
Elffers TW
Trompet S
de Mutsert R
Maan AC
Lamb HJ
Macfarlane PW
Rosendaal FR
Jukema JW
Source :
International journal of cardiology [Int J Cardiol] 2019 Jan 01; Vol. 274, pp. 331-336. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Sep 01.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background: Characteristics and risk factors associated with electrocardiographic borderline Q-waves are not fully elucidated, especially in individuals without overt cardiovascular disease (CVD). Also, the relation of isolated and non-isolated borderline Q-waves with subclinical atherosclerosis and vascular stiffness is unknown.<br />Methods and Results: We included 5746 Netherlands Epidemiology of Obesity study participants without overt CVD. Participants were divided in three groups: no Q-waves (93.7%), isolated (4.6%) and non-isolated borderline Q-waves (1.7%). Borderline Q-waves were defined as Minnesota Codes 1.2.x and 1.3.x and non-isolated as ≥1 of abnormal QRS axis, left ventricular hypertrophy or ST/T abnormalities. Several characteristics and measures of body fat were assessed. Vascular stiffness was assessed by pulse wave velocity (PWV) and subclinical atherosclerosis by carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT). Percentage of men, alcohol intake, blood pressure and fasting glucose concentrations were, compared with no Q-waves, higher in the isolated and highest in the non-isolated borderline Q-wave group. Isolated borderline Q-waves were associated with higher body mass index (difference compared with no Q-waves: 1.0 kg/m <superscript>2</superscript> ; 95%CI: 0.3-1.7; p-value: 0.006), waist circumference (3.4 cm; 1.0-5.8; 0.005), and visceral adipose tissue (21.9 cm <superscript>2</superscript> ; 7.4-36.3; 0.003) and differences were even larger for non-isolated borderline Q-waves. Compared with no Q-waves, non-isolated borderline Q-waves were associated with higher PWV (1.2 m/s; 0.4-2.0; 0.004) and cIMT (23.4 μm; 3.0-43.8; 0.024), whereas isolated borderline Q-waves were not.<br />Conclusion: Cardiovascular risk factors and measures of body fat, especially abdominal adiposity, were higher in participants with isolated borderline Q-waves, compared with no Q-waves, and highest in the non-isolated borderline Q-wave group. Non-isolated borderline Q-waves were associated with subclinical atherosclerosis and vascular stiffness. Future studies should investigate potential added value of borderline Q-waves in CVD prediction.<br /> (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1874-1754
Volume :
274
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
International journal of cardiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30195838
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.08.088