Back to Search
Start Over
Nerve root block versus surgery (NERVES) for the treatment of radicular pain secondary to a prolapsed intervertebral disc herniation: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial.
- Source :
-
Trials [Trials] 2018 Sep 05; Vol. 19 (1), pp. 475. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Sep 05. - Publication Year :
- 2018
-
Abstract
- Background: Sciatica is a common condition reported to affect over 3% of the UK population at any time and is often caused by a prolapsed intervertebral disc (PID). Although the duration and severity of symptoms can vary, pain persisting beyond 6 weeks is unlikely to recover spontaneously and may require investigation and treatment. Currently, there is no specific care pathway for sciatica in the National Health Service (NHS), and no direct comparison exists between surgical microdiscectomy and transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI). The NERVES (NErve Root block VErsus Surgery) trial aims to address this by comparing clinical and cost-effectiveness of surgical microdiscectomy and TFESI to treat sciatica secondary to a PID.<br />Methods/design: A total of 163 patients were recruited from NHS out-patient clinics across the UK and randomised to either microdiscectomy or TFESI. Adult patients (aged 16-65 years) with sciatic pain endured for between 6 weeks and 12 months are eligible if their symptoms have not been improved by at least one form of conservative (non-operative) treatment and they are willing to provide consent. Patients will be excluded if they present with neurological deficit or have had previous surgery at the same level. The primary outcome is patient-reported disability measured using the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) score at 18 weeks post randomisation and secondary outcomes include disability and pain scales using numerical pain ratings, modified Roland-Morris and Core Outcome Measures Index at 12-weekly intervals, and patient satisfaction at 54 weeks. Cost-effectiveness and quality of life (QOL) will be assessed using the EQ-5D-5 L and self-report cost data at 12-weekly intervals and Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data. Adverse event data will be collected. Analysis will follow the principle of intention-to-treat.<br />Discussion: NERVES is the first trial to evaluate the comparative clinical and cost-effectiveness of microdiscectomy to local anaesthetic and steroid administered via TFESI. The results of this research may facilitate the development of an evidence-based treatment strategy for patients with sciatica.<br />Trial Registration: ISRCTN, ID: ISRCTN04820368 . Registered on 5 June 2014. EudraCT EudraCT2014-002751-25. Registered on 8 October 2014.
- Subjects :
- Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Back Pain diagnosis
Back Pain etiology
Back Pain physiopathology
Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Disability Evaluation
Diskectomy adverse effects
Diskectomy economics
Drug Costs
Female
Glucocorticoids adverse effects
Glucocorticoids economics
Humans
Injections, Epidural
Intervertebral Disc Displacement complications
Intervertebral Disc Displacement diagnosis
Intervertebral Disc Displacement physiopathology
Male
Microsurgery adverse effects
Microsurgery economics
Middle Aged
Multicenter Studies as Topic
Nerve Block adverse effects
Nerve Block economics
Pain Measurement
Quality of Life
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Recovery of Function
Sciatica diagnosis
Sciatica etiology
Sciatica physiopathology
Spinal Nerve Roots physiopathology
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Triamcinolone adverse effects
Triamcinolone economics
United Kingdom
Young Adult
Back Pain therapy
Diskectomy methods
Glucocorticoids administration & dosage
Intervertebral Disc Displacement therapy
Microsurgery methods
Nerve Block methods
Sciatica therapy
Spinal Nerve Roots drug effects
Triamcinolone administration & dosage
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1745-6215
- Volume :
- 19
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Trials
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 30185221
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2677-5