Back to Search Start Over

Infections after transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement: mid-term results of 200 consecutive patients.

Authors :
Shehada SE
Wendt D
Peters D
Mourad F
Marx P
Thielmann M
Kahlert P
Lind A
Janosi RA
Rassaf T
Rath PM
Thoenes M
Jakob H
El Gabry M
Source :
Journal of thoracic disease [J Thorac Dis] 2018 Jul; Vol. 10 (7), pp. 4342-4352.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is the standard therapy for high-risk patients with aortic stenosis (AS). TAVI-outcomes are widely investigated in comparison to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), but less is known about infectious complications after TAVI. We aimed to compare early and mid-term infectious outcomes of patients undergoing TAVI or SAVR.<br />Methods: The present study is a prospective single-centre study including 200 consecutive patients between 06/2014-03/2015 undergoing TAVI (either transfemoral or transapical and transaortic, n=47+53=100) or SAVR (either isolated or concomitant with CABG, n=52+48=100). The mean age and log. EuroSCORE were significantly different between both groups (81±6 versus 69±11 years, P<0.001 and 23.1%±13.8% versus 8.7%±9.5%, P<0.001). Primary endpoints included wound healing disorders, respiratory and urinary tract infections and incidence of endocarditis or sepsis within hospital stay. Secondary endpoints included infectious parameters, infectious related rehospitalisation and 2-year mortality.<br />Results: Primary endpoints showed no difference in overall TAVI- versus SAVR-groups regarding respiratory- (14% versus 19%, P=0.45), urinary-tract (7% versus 4%, P=0.54) infections, sepsis (5% versus 6%, P=1.0), endocarditis (0% versus 1%, P=1.0) or 30-day mortality (10% versus 4%, P=0.09), except for wound disorders, which were significantly lower in the TAVI-group (1% versus 8%, P=0.035), respectively. Secondary endpoints reported no difference regarding infectious related rehospitalisation (4% versus 4%, P=1.0), but significantly higher 2-year mortality (28% versus 16%, P=0.048) in the TAVI-group.<br />Conclusions: So far, little has been studied about infectious complications after TAVI. This study reports no difference between the overall TAVI and SAVR groups regarding infectious complications. However, SAVR group show more wound healing disorders but less mortality than TAVI group.<br />Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: This work was presented at the 65th annual meeting of the European Society of Cardiovascular Surgery, April 2016, Belgrade, Serbia.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2072-1439
Volume :
10
Issue :
7
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of thoracic disease
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30174882
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.06.54