Back to Search Start Over

Usability Evaluation of a Novel Robotic Power Wheelchair for Indoor and Outdoor Navigation.

Authors :
Candiotti JL
Kamaraj DC
Daveler B
Chung CS
Grindle GG
Cooper R
Cooper RA
Source :
Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation [Arch Phys Med Rehabil] 2019 Apr; Vol. 100 (4), pp. 627-637. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Aug 25.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Objective: To compare the Mobility Enhancement roBotic (MEBot) wheelchair's capabilities with commercial electric-powered wheelchairs (EPWs) by performing a systematic usability evaluation.<br />Design: Usability in effectiveness, efficacy, and satisfaction was evaluated using quantitative measures. A semistructured interview was employed to gather feedback about the users' interaction with MEBot.<br />Setting: Laboratory testing of EPW driving performance with 2 devices in a controlled setting simulating common EPW driving tasks.<br />Participants: A convenience sample of expert EPW users (N=12; 9 men, 3 women) with an average age of 54.7±10.9 years and 16.3± 8.1 years of EPW driving experience.<br />Interventions: Not applicable.<br />Main Outcome Measures: Powered mobility clinical driving assessment (PMCDA), Satisfaction Questionnaire, National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Task Load Index.<br />Results: Participants were able to perform significantly higher number of tasks (P=.004), with significantly higher scores in both the adequacy-efficacy (P=.005) and the safety (P=.005) domains of the PMCDA while using MEBot over curbs and cross-slopes. However, participants reported significantly higher mental demand (P=.005) while using MEBot to navigate curbs and cross-slopes due to MEBot's complexity to perform its mobility applications which increased user's cognitive demands.<br />Conclusions: Overall, this usability evaluation demonstrated that MEBot is a promising EPW device to use indoors and outdoors with architectural barriers such as curbs and cross-slopes. Current design limitations were highlighted with recommendations for further improvement.<br /> (Copyright © 2018 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1532-821X
Volume :
100
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30148995
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2018.07.432