Physician Extenders in Hand Surgery: The Patient's Perspective.

Background: Physician extenders, such as physician assistants (PAs) and nurse practitioners (NPs), have been incorporated into health systems in response to the rising demand for care. There is a paucity of literature regarding patient perspectives toward physician extenders in hand surgery.
Methods: We anonymously surveyed 939 consecutive new patients before their clinic visit. Our questionnaire assessed patient perspectives toward physician extenders, including optimal scope of practice, the effect of the extender when choosing a hand surgeon, and pay equity for the same clinical services.
Results: Of 939 patients, 784 (84%) responded: 54% were male and 46% were female with a mean age of 44.1 years. Most (65%) patients consider the extender's training background when choosing a hand surgeon, with 31% of all patients considering PAs to have higher training than NPs and 17% the reverse. Patients responded that certain services should be physician-provided, including determining the need for advanced imaging (eg, magnetic resonance imaging), follow-up for abnormal diagnostics, and new patient visits. Patients were amenable to services being extender-provided, including minor in-office procedures, preoperative teaching, and postoperative clinic visits. Patients lacked a consensus toward reimbursement equity for hand surgeons and physician extenders providing the same clinical services.
Conclusions: Our data suggest that patients presenting to a hand surgeon are comfortable receiving direct care from a physician extender in many, but not all, circumstances. Hand surgeons can use these data when deciding how to use extenders to optimize patient satisfaction and practice efficiency as health care systems become increasingly consumer-focused and value-based.