Back to Search Start Over

Effects of titanium oxide surface properties on bone-forming and soft tissue-forming cells.

Authors :
Wheelis SE
Montaño-Figueroa AG
Quevedo-Lopez M
Rodrigues DC
Source :
Clinical implant dentistry and related research [Clin Implant Dent Relat Res] 2018 Oct; Vol. 20 (5), pp. 838-847. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Aug 15.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have concluded that certain titanium oxide (TiO <subscript>2</subscript> ) surface properties promote bone-forming cell attachment. However, no comprehensive studies have investigated the effects of TiO <subscript>2</subscript> surface and film morphology on hard and soft tissues.<br />Purpose: The aim of this study is to understand the effects of TiO <subscript>2</subscript> morphology on the proliferation and differentiation of murine preosteoblasts (MC3T3-E1) and proliferation of human gingival fibroblasts (HGF-1) using in vitro experiments.<br />Materials and Methods: Samples were fabricated with several TiO <subscript>2</subscript> thickness and crystalline structure to mimic various dental implant surfaces. in vitro analysis was performed for 1, 3, and 7 days on these samples to assess the viability of MC3T3-E1 and HGF-1 cells in contact with the modified oxide surfaces.<br />Results: Results showed that HGF-1 cells exhibited no significant difference in viability on modified oxide surfaces versus a titanium control across experiments. MC3T3-E1 cells exhibited a significantly higher viability for the modified oxide surface in 1 day experiments, but not in 3 or 7 day experiments. Alkaline phosphatase expression in MC3T3-E1 was not significantly different on modified oxide surfaces versus the control across all experiments. A slight positive trend in viability was observed for cells in contact with rougher modified oxide surfaces versus a titanium control in both cell types.<br />Conclusions: These observations suggest that crystallinity and thickness do not affect the long-term viability of hard or soft tissue cells when compared to a cpTi surface. Therefore, treatments like anodization on implant components may not directly affect the attachment of hard or soft tissue cells in vivo.<br /> (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1708-8208
Volume :
20
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical implant dentistry and related research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30110131
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12656