Back to Search Start Over

Cardiorespiratory responses to heavy military load carriage over complex terrain.

Authors :
Looney DP
Santee WR
Blanchard LA
Karis AJ
Carter AJ
Potter AW
Source :
Applied ergonomics [Appl Ergon] 2018 Nov; Vol. 73, pp. 194-198. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Jul 24.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

This study examined complex terrain march performance and cardiorespiratory responses when carrying different Soldier loads. Nine active duty military personnel (age, 21 ± 3 yr; height, 1.72 ± 0.07 m; body mass (BM), 83.4 ± 12.9 kg) attended two test visits during which they completed consecutive laps around a 2.5-km mixed terrain course with either a fighting load (30% BM) or an approach load (45% BM). Respiratory rate and heart rate data were collected using physiological status monitors. Training impulse (TRIMP) scores were calculated using Banister's formula to provide an integrated measure of both time and cardiorespiratory demands. Completion times were not significantly different between the fighting and approach loads for either Lap 1 (p = 0.38) or Lap 2 (p = 0.09). Respiration rate was not significantly higher with the approach load than the fighting load during Lap 1 (p = 0.17) but was significantly higher for Lap 2 (p = 0.04). However, heart rate was significantly higher with the approach load versus the fighting load during both Lap 1 (p = 0.03) and Lap 2 (p = 0.04). Furthermore, TRIMP was significantly greater with the approach load versus the fighting load during both Lap 1 (p = 0.02) and Lap 2 (p = 0.02). Trained military personnel can maintain similar pacing while carrying either fighting or approach loads during short mixed terrain marches. However, cardiorespiratory demands are greatly elevated with the approach load and will likely continue to rise during longer distance marches.<br /> (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1872-9126
Volume :
73
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Applied ergonomics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30098635
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.07.010