Back to Search Start Over

Use of a Home-Based Manual as Part of a Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program.

Authors :
de Souza Y
da Silva KM
Condesso D
Figueira B
Noronha Filho AJ
Rufino R
Gosselink R
da Costa CH
Source :
Respiratory care [Respir Care] 2018 Dec; Vol. 63 (12), pp. 1485-1491. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Aug 07.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary rehabilitation programs improve exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with COPD. Domiciliary strategies to maintain these benefits have been proposed.<br />Objective: This study aimed to determine whether a rehabilitation manual would facilitate the maintenance of the benefits acquired during out-patient pulmonary rehabilitation.<br />Methods: Fifty subjects with stable COPD were included (26 women and 24 men). All the subjects were evaluated during screening and after 12 wk of out-patient rehabilitation, and then were randomly divided into 2 groups, with one group that received the rehabilitation manual for home use (manual group) and the other group only received verbal recommendations (control group). At this point, the 2 groups were similar. After 12 wk at home, both groups were evaluated a third time. All evaluations included a 6-min walk test (6MWT), 6-min step test, COPD Assessment Test, and measurement of dyspnea by using the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale.<br />Results: When comparing the results of the 6MWT and 6-min step test done at out-patient discharge and after 12 wk at home, the manual group presented no differences (6MWT, 0 ± 25 m; 6-min step test, 1 ± 32 steps), whereas the control subjects lost part of the gain obtained during rehabilitation (6MWT -46 ± 36 m; 6-min step test -39 ± 33 steps). There was a significant difference between the groups ( P < .05). When comparing the same time points, the change in the COPD Assessment Test score was -1 ± 1 for the manual group and 1 ± 2 for the control group ( P = .01). For the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale, the change in score was 0 ± 1 for the manual group and 1 ± 1 for the control group ( P = .01).<br />Conclusions: The use of a simple, well-illustrated manual facilitated the maintenance of the benefits acquired in out-patient pulmonary rehabilitation over a period of 3 months after study termination.<br />Competing Interests: The authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2018 by Daedalus Enterprises.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1943-3654
Volume :
63
Issue :
12
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Respiratory care
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30087196
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.05656