Back to Search Start Over

Comparative outcomes of radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's oesophagus with different baseline histology.

Authors :
Tan WK
Rattan A
O'Donovan M
Nuckcheddy T
Alias B
Sujendran V
di Pietro M
Source :
United European gastroenterology journal [United European Gastroenterol J] 2018 Jun; Vol. 6 (5), pp. 662-668. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Jan 17.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Background: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is currently recommended for dysplastic Barrett's oesophagus (BO); however, there are limited data on treatment response when stratified by baseline histology.<br />Objective: The objective of this article is to evaluate RFA outcomes and durability for BO with different baseline histology.<br />Methods: Patients treated with RFA between 2007 and 2017 at a single institution were retrospectively included. Outcome measures were: (a) complete remission of dysplasia (CRD) and intestinal metaplasia (CRIM) at 18 months, (b) complication rate and (c) durability of CRD and CRIM.<br />Results: A total of 148 patients underwent RFA, of whom 113 completed the treatment protocol (21 low-grade dysplasia (LGD), 46 high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and 46 intramucosal carcinoma (IMC)). CRD and CRIM were achieved in 94.7% and 78.8% of patients, respectively. When stratified by baseline histology, there was no significant difference in CRD between groups (LGD, 95.2%; HGD, 95.7%; and IMC, 93.5%; p  = 0.89). Similarly, there was no significant difference in CRIM between groups (LGD, 71.4%; HGD, 76.1% and IMC, 87.0%; p  = 0.39). CRD and CRIM durability at 24 months for LGD, HGD and IMC were 100%, 97.7% and 100% (log rank p  = 0.31), and 100%, 89.0% and 95.5%, respectively (log rank p  = 0.62).<br />Conclusion: Baseline histology is not a predictor of RFA response. Once CRD and CRIM are achieved, these effects are durable over time.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2050-6406
Volume :
6
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
United European gastroenterology journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30083327
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/2050640617752183