Back to Search Start Over

A Prospective, Randomized, Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fibrin Sealant Grifols as an Adjunct to Hemostasis as Compared to Cellulose Sheets in Hepatic Surgery Resections.

Authors :
Bjelović M
Ayguasanosa J
Kim RD
Stojanović M
Vereczkei A
Nikolić S
Winslow E
Emre S
Xiao G
Navarro-Puerto J
Courtney K
Barrera G
Source :
Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract [J Gastrointest Surg] 2018 Nov; Vol. 22 (11), pp. 1939-1949. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Jul 02.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Background: Local hemostatic agents have a role in limiting bleeding complications associated with liver resection.<br />Methods: In this randomized, phase III study, we compared the efficacy and safety of Fibrin Sealant Grifols (FS Grifols) with oxidized cellulose sheets (Surgicel®) as adjuncts to hemostasis during hepatic resections. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving hemostasis at target bleeding sites (TBS) within 4 min (T <subscript>4</subscript> ) of treatment application. Secondary efficacy variables were time to hemostasis (TTH) at a later time point if re-bleeding occurs and cumulative proportion of patients achieving hemostasis by time points T <subscript>2</subscript> , T <subscript>3</subscript> , T <subscript>5</subscript> , T <subscript>7</subscript> , and T <subscript>10</subscript> .<br />Results: The rate of hemostasis by T <subscript>4</subscript> was 92.8% in the FS Grifols group (n = 163) and 80.5% in the Surgicel® group (n = 162) (p = 0.01). The mean TTH was significantly shorter (p < 0.001) in the FS Grifols group (2.8 ± 0.14 vs. 3.8 ± 0.24 min). The rate of hemostasis by T <subscript>2</subscript> , T <subscript>5</subscript> , and T <subscript>7</subscript> was higher and statistically superior in the FS Grifols group compared to Surgicel®. No substantial differences in adverse events (AE) were noted between treatment groups. The most common AEs were procedural pain (36.2 vs. 37.7%), nausea (20.9 vs. 23.5%), and hypotension (14.1 vs 6.2%).<br />Conclusions: FS Grifols was safe and well tolerated as a local hemostatic agent during liver resection surgeries. Overall, data demonstrate that the hemostatic efficacy of FS Grifols is superior to Surgicel® and support the use of FS Grifols as an effective local hemostatic agent in these surgical procedures.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1873-4626
Volume :
22
Issue :
11
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
29967969
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-018-3852-4