Back to Search Start Over

Circulating Vitamin D and Colorectal Cancer Risk: An International Pooling Project of 17 Cohorts.

Authors :
McCullough ML
Zoltick ES
Weinstein SJ
Fedirko V
Wang M
Cook NR
Eliassen AH
Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A
Agnoli C
Albanes D
Barnett MJ
Buring JE
Campbell PT
Clendenen TV
Freedman ND
Gapstur SM
Giovannucci EL
Goodman GG
Haiman CA
Ho GYF
Horst RL
Hou T
Huang WY
Jenab M
Jones ME
Joshu CE
Krogh V
Lee IM
Lee JE
Männistö S
Le Marchand L
Mondul AM
Neuhouser ML
Platz EA
Purdue MP
Riboli E
Robsahm TE
Rohan TE
Sasazuki S
Schoemaker MJ
Sieri S
Stampfer MJ
Swerdlow AJ
Thomson CA
Tretli S
Tsugane S
Ursin G
Visvanathan K
White KK
Wu K
Yaun SS
Zhang X
Willett WC
Gail MH
Ziegler RG
Smith-Warner SA
Source :
Journal of the National Cancer Institute [J Natl Cancer Inst] 2019 Feb 01; Vol. 111 (2), pp. 158-169.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background: Experimental and epidemiological studies suggest a protective role for vitamin D in colorectal carcinogenesis, but evidence is inconclusive. Circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentrations that minimize risk are unknown. Current Institute of Medicine (IOM) vitamin D guidance is based solely on bone health.<br />Methods: We pooled participant-level data from 17 cohorts, comprising 5706 colorectal cancer case participants and 7107 control participants with a wide range of circulating 25(OH)D concentrations. For 30.1% of participants, 25(OH)D was newly measured. Previously measured 25(OH)D was calibrated to the same assay to permit estimating risk by absolute concentrations. Study-specific relative risks (RRs) for prediagnostic season-standardized 25(OH)D concentrations were calculated using conditional logistic regression and pooled using random effects models.<br />Results: Compared with the lower range of sufficiency for bone health (50-<62.5 nmol/L), deficient 25(OH)D (<30 nmol/L) was associated with 31% higher colorectal cancer risk (RR = 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05 to 1.62); 25(OH)D above sufficiency (75-<87.5 and 87.5-<100 nmol/L) was associated with 19% (RR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.67 to 0.99) and 27% (RR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.59 to 0.91) lower risk, respectively. At 25(OH)D of 100 nmol/L or greater, risk did not continue to decline and was not statistically significantly reduced (RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.67 to 1.24, 3.5% of control participants). Associations were minimally affected when adjusting for body mass index, physical activity, or other risk factors. For each 25 nmol/L increment in circulating 25(OH)D, colorectal cancer risk was 19% lower in women (RR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.75 to 0.87) and 7% lower in men (RR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.86 to 1.00) (two-sided Pheterogeneity by sex = .008). Associations were inverse in all subgroups, including colorectal subsite, geographic region, and season of blood collection.<br />Conclusions: Higher circulating 25(OH)D was related to a statistically significant, substantially lower colorectal cancer risk in women and non-statistically significant lower risk in men. Optimal 25(OH)D concentrations for colorectal cancer risk reduction, 75-100 nmol/L, appear higher than current IOM recommendations.<br /> (Published by Oxford University Press 2018.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1460-2105
Volume :
111
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
29912394
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djy087