Back to Search Start Over

New-generation full-spectrum endoscopy versus standard forward-viewing colonoscopy: a multicenter, randomized, tandem colonoscopy trial (J-FUSE Study).

Authors :
Kudo T
Saito Y
Ikematsu H
Hotta K
Takeuchi Y
Shimatani M
Kawakami K
Tamai N
Mori Y
Maeda Y
Yamada M
Sakamoto T
Matsuda T
Imai K
Ito S
Hamada K
Fukata N
Inoue T
Tajiri H
Yoshimura K
Ishikawa H
Kudo SE
Source :
Gastrointestinal endoscopy [Gastrointest Endosc] 2018 Nov; Vol. 88 (5), pp. 854-864. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Jun 13.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Background and Aims: Although colonoscopy is the criterion standard for detection of colorectal adenomas, some adenomas are missed. Full-spectrum endoscopy (FUSE) allows for observation with a 330-degree angle of view, which is expected to decrease the miss rate. However, no consensus has been reached regarding the superiority of FUSE over standard forward-viewing colonoscopy (SFVC) for detection of adenomas; we therefore compared new-generation FUSE and SFVC regarding colorectal adenoma miss rate (AMR) in this, the first reported randomized control trial using new-generation FUSE.<br />Methods: We enrolled individuals aged 40 to 75 years who had been referred for screening, surveillance, fecal occult blood test positivity, or symptoms in a prospective randomized trial of tandem colonoscopy in 8 institutions. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via computer-generated stratified randomization. Neither the endoscopists nor patients were blinded to the allocation. The primary endpoint was AMR per patient (AMR-PP).<br />Results: We enrolled 345 patients and included 319 in the per-protocol analyses. AMR-PP was significantly lower with FUSE (11.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8.0%-15.4%) than with SFVC (22.9%; 95% CI, 17.5%-28.3%; P < .001). AMR-PP for lesions ≤5 mm in size was significantly lower with FUSE (10.4%; 95% CI, 6.5%-14.3%) than with SFVC (20.0%; 95% CI, 14.4%-25.6%; P = .0057). Furthermore, AMR-PP in the ascending colon was significantly lower with FUSE (4.3%; 95% CI, 1.4%-7.2%) than with SFVC (10.6%; 95% CI, 6.1%-15.1%; P = .0212).<br />Conclusions: FUSE is superior to SFVC regarding both AMR-PP and AMR; additionally, AMR-PP is both significantly lower with FUSE than SFVC for lesions ≤5 mm in size and in the ascending colon. (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN000020448.).<br /> (Copyright © 2018 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1097-6779
Volume :
88
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Gastrointestinal endoscopy
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
29908178
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2018.06.011