Back to Search
Start Over
The novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have worse outcomes compared with warfarin in patients with intracranial hemorrhage after TBI.
- Source :
-
The journal of trauma and acute care surgery [J Trauma Acute Care Surg] 2018 Nov; Vol. 85 (5), pp. 915-920. - Publication Year :
- 2018
-
Abstract
- Introduction: Novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC) use is increasing in trauma patients. The reversal of these agents after hemorrhage is still evolving. The aim of our study was to evaluate outcomes after traumatic brain injury in patients on NOACs.<br />Methods: 3-year (2014-2016) analysis of our prospectively maintained traumatic brain injury (TBI) database. We included all TBI patients with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) on anticoagulants. Patients were stratified into two groups, those on NOACs and on warfarin, and were matched in a 1:2 ratio using propensity score matching for demographics, injury and vital parameters, type, and size of ICH. Outcome measures were progression of ICH, mortality, skilled nursing facility (SNF) disposition, and hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS).<br />Results: We analyzed 1,459 TBI patients, of which 210 patients were matched (NAOCs, 70; warfarin, 140). Matched groups were similar in age (p = 0.21), mechanism of injury (p = 0.61), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score (p = 0.54), Injury Severity Score (p = 0.62), and type and size of ICH (p = 0.09). Patients on preinjury NOACs had higher rate of progression (p = 0.03), neurosurgical intervention (p = 0.04), mortality (p = 0.04), and longer ICU LOS (p = 0.04) compared with patients on warfarin. However, there was no difference in hospital LOS (p = 0.22) and SNF disposition (p = 0.14). On sub-analysis of severe TBI patients (GCS ≤ 8), rate of progression (p = 0.59), neurosurgical intervention (p = 0.62), or mortality (p = 0.81) was similar in both groups.<br />Conclusions: The use of NOACs generally carries a high risk of bleeding and can be detrimental in head injuries with ICH. NOAC use is associated with increased risk of progression of ICH, neurosurgical intervention, and mortality after a mild and moderate TBI. Primary care physicians and cardiologists need to reconsider the data on the need for anticoagulation and the type of agent used and weigh it against the risk of bleeding. In addition, development of reversal agents for the NOACs and implementation of a strict protocol for the reversal of these agents may lead to improved outcomes.<br />Level of Evidence: Therapeutic studies, level III.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Aged
Anticoagulants administration & dosage
Disease Progression
Female
Glasgow Coma Scale
Humans
Intensive Care Units
Intracranial Hemorrhage, Traumatic surgery
Length of Stay
Male
Middle Aged
Pyrazoles administration & dosage
Pyridones administration & dosage
Rivaroxaban administration & dosage
Skilled Nursing Facilities
Survival Rate
Treatment Outcome
Anticoagulants adverse effects
Intracranial Hemorrhage, Traumatic chemically induced
Pyrazoles adverse effects
Pyridones adverse effects
Rivaroxaban adverse effects
Warfarin adverse effects
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2163-0763
- Volume :
- 85
- Issue :
- 5
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- The journal of trauma and acute care surgery
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 29851905
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000001995