Back to Search Start Over

Genetic and environmental factors affecting birth size variation: a pooled individual-based analysis of secular trends and global geographical differences using 26 twin cohorts.

Authors :
Yokoyama Y
Jelenkovic A
Hur YM
Sund R
Fagnani C
Stazi MA
Brescianini S
Ji F
Ning F
Pang Z
Knafo-Noam A
Mankuta D
Abramson L
Rebato E
Hopper JL
Cutler TL
Saudino KJ
Nelson TL
Whitfield KE
Corley RP
Huibregtse BM
Derom CA
Vlietinck RF
Loos RJF
Llewellyn CH
Fisher A
Bjerregaard-Andersen M
Beck-Nielsen H
Sodemann M
Krueger RF
McGue M
Pahlen S
Bartels M
van Beijsterveldt CEM
Willemsen G
Harris JR
Brandt I
Nilsen TS
Craig JM
Saffery R
Dubois L
Boivin M
Brendgen M
Dionne G
Vitaro F
Haworth CMA
Plomin R
Bayasgalan G
Narandalai D
Rasmussen F
Tynelius P
Tarnoki AD
Tarnoki DL
Ooki S
Rose RJ
Pietiläinen KH
Sørensen TIA
Boomsma DI
Kaprio J
Silventoinen K
Source :
International journal of epidemiology [Int J Epidemiol] 2018 Aug 01; Vol. 47 (4), pp. 1195-1206.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Background: The genetic architecture of birth size may differ geographically and over time. We examined differences in the genetic and environmental contributions to birthweight, length and ponderal index (PI) across geographical-cultural regions (Europe, North America and Australia, and East Asia) and across birth cohorts, and how gestational age modifies these effects.<br />Methods: Data from 26 twin cohorts in 16 countries including 57 613 monozygotic and dizygotic twin pairs were pooled. Genetic and environmental variations of birth size were estimated using genetic structural equation modelling.<br />Results: The variance of birthweight and length was predominantly explained by shared environmental factors, whereas the variance of PI was explained both by shared and unique environmental factors. Genetic variance contributing to birth size was small. Adjusting for gestational age decreased the proportions of shared environmental variance and increased the propositions of unique environmental variance. Genetic variance was similar in the geographical-cultural regions, but shared environmental variance was smaller in East Asia than in Europe and North America and Australia. The total variance and shared environmental variance of birth length and PI were greater from the birth cohort 1990-99 onwards compared with the birth cohorts from 1970-79 to 1980-89.<br />Conclusions: The contribution of genetic factors to birth size is smaller than that of shared environmental factors, which is partly explained by gestational age. Shared environmental variances of birth length and PI were greater in the latest birth cohorts and differed also across geographical-cultural regions. Shared environmental factors are important when explaining differences in the variation of birth size globally and over time.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1464-3685
Volume :
47
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
International journal of epidemiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
29788280
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyy081