Back to Search
Start Over
Propensity score matched comparison of subcutaneous and transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in the SIMPLE and EFFORTLESS studies.
- Source :
-
Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology [Europace] 2018 Sep 01; Vol. 20 (FI2), pp. f240-f248. - Publication Year :
- 2018
-
Abstract
- Aims: Comparison of outcomes between subcutaneous and transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD and TV-ICD) therapy is hampered by varying patient characteristics and complication definitions. The aim of this analysis is to compare clinical outcomes of S-ICD and TV-ICD therapy in a matched cohort.<br />Methods and Results: Patients implanted with de novo implantable cardioverter-defibrillators without need for pacing were selected from two studies: SIMPLE (n = 1091 single and n = 553 dual chamber TV-ICDs) and EFFORTLESS (n = 798 S-ICDs). Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients were 1:1 matched on propensity score to TV-ICD patients. Propensity scores were calculated using 15 baseline characteristics including diagnosis. The Kaplan-Meier estimates for complications requiring invasive intervention, appropriate shocks, and inappropriate shocks were calculated at 3 years follow-up. The primary analysis yielded 391 patients pairs with balanced baseline characteristics, with mean age 55 ± 14 years, 49% ischaemic cardiomyopathy, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 40%, 71% primary prevention, and 89% of TV-ICDs were single chamber. Follow-up was mean 2.9 years in the S-ICD arm vs. 3.3 in the TV-ICD arm. All-cause complications occurred in 9.0% of S-ICD vs. 6.5% of TV-ICD patients, P = 0.29. Appropriate shocks occurred in 9.9% of S-ICD vs. 13.8% in TV-ICD patients, P = 0.03 and inappropriate shocks in 11.9% in S-ICD vs. 8.9% in TV-ICD patients (P = 0.07). Total shock burden (20 vs. 31, P = 0.05) and appropriate shock burden per 100 patients years (9 vs. 18, P = 0.02) were lower for S-ICD patients, while inappropriate shock burden was equal (11 vs. 13, P = 0.56).<br />Conclusion: The earliest experience of the S-ICD demonstrates similar outcomes as contemporary TV-ICD therapy in a matched comparison with predominately single-chamber devices at 3 years follow-up.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Aged
Arrhythmias, Cardiac diagnosis
Arrhythmias, Cardiac mortality
Arrhythmias, Cardiac physiopathology
Death, Sudden, Cardiac epidemiology
Electric Countershock adverse effects
Electric Countershock mortality
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Multicenter Studies as Topic
Observational Studies as Topic
Propensity Score
Prosthesis Implantation adverse effects
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Arrhythmias, Cardiac therapy
Death, Sudden, Cardiac prevention & control
Defibrillators, Implantable
Electric Countershock instrumentation
Prosthesis Implantation methods
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1532-2092
- Volume :
- 20
- Issue :
- FI2
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 29771327
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euy083