Back to Search Start Over

Measuring outcome differences associated with STEMI screening and diagnostic performance: a multicentred retrospective cohort study protocol.

Authors :
Yiadom MYAB
Mumma BE
Baugh CW
Patterson BW
Mills AM
Salazar G
Tanski M
Jenkins CA
Vogus TJ
Miller KF
Jackson BE
Lehmann CU
Dorner SC
West JL
Wang TJ
Collins SP
Dittus RS
Bernard GR
Storrow AB
Liu D
Source :
BMJ open [BMJ Open] 2018 May 03; Vol. 8 (5), pp. e022453. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 May 03.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Introduction: Advances in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) management have involved improving the clinical processes connecting patients with timely emergency cardiovascular care. Screening upon emergency department (ED) arrival for an early ECG to diagnose STEMI, however, is not optimal for all patients. In addition, the degree to which timely screening and diagnosis are associated with improved time to intervention and postpercutaneous coronary intervention outcomes, under more contemporary practice conditions, is not known.<br />Methods: We present the methods for a retrospective multicentre cohort study anticipated to include 1220 patients across seven EDs to (1) evaluate the relationship between timely screening and diagnosis with treatment and postintervention clinical outcomes; (2) introduce novel measures for cross-facility performance comparisons of screening and diagnostic care team performance including: door-to-screening, door-to-diagnosis and door-to-catheterisation laboratory arrival times and (3) describe the use of electronic health record data in tandem with an existing disease registry.<br />Ethics and Dissemination: The completion of this study will provide critical feedback on the quality of screening and diagnostic performance within the contemporary STEMI care pathway that can be used to (1) improve emergency care delivery for patients with STEMI presenting to the ED, (2) present novel metrics for the comparison of screening and diagnostic care and (3) inform the development of screening and diagnostic support tools that could be translated to other care environments. We will disseminate our results via publication and quality performance data sharing with each site. Institutional ethics review approval was received prior to study initiation.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: MYABY is Director of the Emergency Department Operations Study Group (EDOSG). CWB is a member of the Advisory Board, consultant for Roche Diagnostics and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, and has received research funding from Boehringer Ingelheim. ABS has also received grant support from Abbott Diagnostics and Roche Diagnostics. He is a consultant for Roche Diagnostics, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp, Alere Diagnostics, Trevena, Beckman Coulter and Siemens. SPC received grant research support from NIH/NHLBI, PCORI, Cardiorentis, Novartis and Cardioxyl and consultant support/other from Novartis, Trevena, Cardiorentis, Cardioxyl and Siemens.<br /> (© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2044-6055
Volume :
8
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
BMJ open
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
29724744
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022453