Back to Search Start Over

Participant characteristics of users of holistic movement practices in Australia.

Authors :
Vergeer I
Bennie JA
Charity MJ
van Uffelen JGZ
Harvey JT
Biddle SJH
Eime RM
Source :
Complementary therapies in clinical practice [Complement Ther Clin Pract] 2018 May; Vol. 31, pp. 181-187. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Feb 14.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the characteristics of users of holistic movement practices in Australia to people who were physically active but not using holistic movement practices. A second aim was to compare characteristics of users of specific holistic movement practices (yoga/Pilates and t'ai chi/qigong).<br />Design: We performed a secondary data analysis on pooled data of a nationally-representative physical activity survey conducted yearly 2001-2010 (n = 195,926).<br />Setting: Australia-wide Exercise, Recreation, and Sport Survey (ERASS).<br />Main Outcome Measures: A range of socio-demographic and participation characteristics were documented and compared between users and non-users of holistic movement practices and between yoga/Pilates and t'ai chi/qigong users, employing descriptive statistics, chi square, and multiple logistic regression analyses.<br />Results: Users of holistic movement practices (n = 6826) were significantly more likely than non-users to be female, older, have fewer children at home, and have higher levels of education, socio-economic background, and physical activity involvement (p < 0.001). Yoga/Pilates (n = 5733) and t'ai chi/qigong (n = 947) users were also found to differ on a number of characteristics, including age, sex, socioeconomic background, and marital status.<br />Conclusion: As a group, Australian users of holistic movement practices differ on a range of characteristics from those Australians active in other types of physical activities. However, differences between yoga/Pilates and t'ai chi/qigong users suggest these practices attract somewhat different sub-populations. To what extent these differences are due to characteristics inherent to the practices themselves or to differences in delivery-related parameters needs to be examined in future research.<br /> (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1873-6947
Volume :
31
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Complementary therapies in clinical practice
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
29705453
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2018.02.011