Back to Search Start Over

Short-Term (<8 wk) High-Intensity Interval Training in Diseased Cohorts.

Authors :
Blackwell JEM
Doleman B
Herrod PJJ
Ricketts S
Phillips BE
Lund JN
Williams JP
Source :
Medicine and science in sports and exercise [Med Sci Sports Exerc] 2018 Sep; Vol. 50 (9), pp. 1740-1749.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Background and Aim: Exercise training regimes can lead to improvements in measures of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), improved general health, and reduced morbidity and overall mortality risk. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) offers a time-efficient approach to improve CRF in healthy individuals, but the relative benefits of HIIT compared with traditional training methods are unknown in across different disease cohorts.&lt;br /&gt;Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis compares CRF gains in randomized controlled trials of short-term (&lt;8 wk) HIIT versus either no exercise control (CON) or moderate continuous training (MCT) within diseased cohorts. Literature searches of the following databases were performed: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED, and PubMed (all from inception to December 1, 2017), with further searches of Clinicaltrials.gov and citations via Google Scholar. Primary outcomes were effect on CRF variables: V˙O2peak and anaerobic threshold.&lt;br /&gt;Results: Thirty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria. HIIT resulted in a clinically significant increase in V˙O2peak compared with CON (mean difference [MD] = 3.32 mL&#183;kg&#183;min, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.56-2.08). Overall HIIT provided added benefit to V˙O2peak over MCT (MD = 0.79 mL&#183;kg&#183;min, 95% CI = 0.20-1.39). The benefit of HIIT was most marked in patients with cardiovascular disease when compared with MCT (V˙O2peak: MD = 1.66 mL&#183;kg&#183;min, 95% CI = 0.60-2.73; anaerobic threshold: MD = 1.61 mL&#183;kg&#183;min, 95% CI = 0.33-2.90).&lt;br /&gt;Conclusions: HIIT elicits improvements in objective measures of CRF within 8 wk in diseased cohorts compared with no intervention. When compared with MCT, HIIT imparts statistically significant additional improvements in measures of CRF, with clinically important additional improvements in V˙O2peak in cardiovascular patients. Comparative efficacy of HIIT versus MCT combined with an often reduced time commitment may warrant HIIT&#39;s promotion as a viable clinical exercise intervention.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1530-0315
Volume :
50
Issue :
9
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Medicine and science in sports and exercise
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
29683925
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001634