Back to Search
Start Over
Comparative evaluation of dentinal crack formation after root canal preparation using ProTaper Next, OneShape, and Hyflex EDM.
- Source :
-
Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD [J Conserv Dent] 2018 Mar-Apr; Vol. 21 (2), pp. 153-156. - Publication Year :
- 2018
-
Abstract
- Introduction: The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of dentinal crack formation after root canal preparation using ProTaper Next, OneShape, and Hyflex electrodischarge machining (HEDM).<br />Materials and Methods: A total of 75 extracted mandibular premolars were selected. The root canals were instrumented using ProTaper Next, OneShape, and HEDM rotary files. All roots were horizontally sectioned at 3, 6, and 9 mm from apex with slow-speed saw under water cooling. The sections were observed under a stereomicroscope at ×25 to determine the absence or presence of crack. Data were analyzed using post hoc test and one-way ANOVA.<br />Results: ProTaper Next and HEDM produced significantly less cracks than OneShape.<br />Conclusion: Within the limitation of this in vitro study, it can be concluded that nickel-titanium instruments may cause cracks on the root surface. ProTaper Next and HEDM tend to produce less number of cracks as compared to OneShape.<br />Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest.
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 0972-0707
- Volume :
- 21
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 29674816
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_219_17