Back to Search
Start Over
Laparoscopic inguinal ligament suspension with uterine preservation for pelvic organ prolapse: A retrospective cohort study.
- Source :
-
International journal of surgery (London, England) [Int J Surg] 2018 Jun; Vol. 54 (Pt A), pp. 28-34. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Apr 16. - Publication Year :
- 2018
-
Abstract
- Objective: To introduce an alternative surgical technique of laparoscopic inguinal ligament suspension (LILS) with uterine preservation and evaluate its efficacy and safety for patients with severe pelvic organ prolapse (POP).<br />Methods: Between June 2014 and December 2015, 35 patients with symptomatic stage III or IV were treated by LILS with uterine preservation. The perioperative parameters including surgical time, blood loss, hospital stay and complications were recorded. The anatomical cure rate was evaluated according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Questionnaire (POP-Q) assessment. The anatomical points were analyzed by dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Validated questionnaire of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20), the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) and the Pelvic organ prolapse urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12) were recorded to evaluate the symptom severity, quality of life and sexual activity.<br />Results: The mean surgical time was 163.8 ± 42.3 min (range: 120-280 min), the mean estimated blood loss was 48.6 ± 60.5 ml (range: 10-200 ml), and the mean hospital stay was 5 days (range: 3-7 days). No intra-operative complications were encountered. The anatomical success rate at postoperative 6-month and 12-month was 97.1% and 94.3%, respectively. The postoperative anatomical points on straining showed a significant improvement on dynamic MRI as compared to baselines. The symptom severity, quality of life and sexual activity also presented significant improvement both 6-month and 12-month after surgery. After a minimal 12 months follow-up, no postoperative complications occurred and the recurrence prolapse were low.<br />Conclusion: LILS with uterine preservation is a feasible, effective and safe surgical alternative in the treatment of POP for patients who desire to reserve uterus. Longer follow-up data from larger studies are required to confirm the benefits of LILS with uterine preservation as a minimally invasive surgical approach.<br /> (Copyright © 2018 IJS Publishing Group Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Adult
Aged
Blood Loss, Surgical
Female
Humans
Laparoscopy adverse effects
Length of Stay
Middle Aged
Operative Time
Pelvic Floor surgery
Postoperative Complications etiology
Postoperative Period
Quality of Life
Retrospective Studies
Surveys and Questionnaires
Treatment Outcome
Laparoscopy methods
Ligaments surgery
Organ Sparing Treatments methods
Pelvic Organ Prolapse surgery
Uterus surgery
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1743-9159
- Volume :
- 54
- Issue :
- Pt A
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- International journal of surgery (London, England)
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 29673691
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.020