Back to Search Start Over

A long-term prospective cohort study on immediately restored single tooth implants inserted in extraction sockets and healed ridges: CBCT analyses, soft tissue alterations, aesthetic ratings, and patient-reported outcomes.

Authors :
Raes S
Eghbali A
Chappuis V
Raes F
De Bruyn H
Cosyn J
Source :
Clinical implant dentistry and related research [Clin Implant Dent Relat Res] 2018 Aug; Vol. 20 (4), pp. 522-530. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Apr 19.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Background: Although many studies have been published on single implants, long-term data remain scarce.<br />Purpose: To evaluate immediately restored single implants after at least 8 years of follow-up in terms of buccal bone, soft tissue alterations, aesthetic ratings, and patient-reported outcomes.<br />Materials and Methods: This prospective cohort study included patients who were consecutively treated with an immediately restored single implant installed in an extraction socket (IIT) or a healed ridge (CIT) in the anterior maxilla. Biomaterials were never used. CBCTs were taken at study termination, soft tissue alterations, and Pink Esthetic Score were evaluated between 1 year and study termination using standardized clinical images. Patient satisfaction was also registered.<br />Results: About 11/16 initially treated patients in the IIT cohort (10 men, 6 women; mean age 45) and 18/23 initially treated patients in the CIT cohort (12 men, 11 women; mean age 40) could be evaluated after more than 8 years. A buccal bone wall less than 2 mm was found at all implant sites. A thin buccal bone wall less than 1 mm was found at 42% of the implant sites. In the CIT cohort, 8 patients had a missing buccal bone in the crestal area, although bone was present at the time of surgery. Alveolar process deficiency significantly deteriorated (P ≤ .046), whereas vertical soft tissue levels and PES remained stable over time in both cohorts. Patients expressed high overall satisfaction.<br />Conclusions: Substantial dimensional changes may be expected at the buccal aspect of single implants inserted in the premaxilla. As a result, contour augmentation procedures at the time of implant placement should be considered to counteract these bone alterations, even when implants are fully embedded in bone upon insertion.<br /> (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1708-8208
Volume :
20
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical implant dentistry and related research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
29671940
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12613