Back to Search
Start Over
Results of second salvage therapy in 673 adults with acute myelogenous leukemia treated at a single institution since 2000.
- Source :
-
Cancer [Cancer] 2018 Jun 15; Vol. 124 (12), pp. 2534-2540. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Apr 12. - Publication Year :
- 2018
-
Abstract
- Background: The prognosis is poor for patients who have relapsed-refractory acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). Most published reports analyzed results from therapies in first-salvage AML or in studies that were conducted before 2000. Several novel agents and strategies are being tested for potential approval as treatment for patients with relapsed-refractory AML in second salvage. Therefore, it is important to establish the historic results of anti-AML therapies in this setting in the modern era. The objective of the current study was to analyze the results from second salvage therapies in patients with AML since 2000 with regard to response and survival.<br />Methods: In total, 673 patients who received second salvage therapies for AML since 2000 were analyzed. Their median age was 60 years (range, 18-89 years). Salvage therapy consisted of cytarabine-based regimens in 267 patients, noncytarabine combinations in 37, hypomethylating agent-based regimens in 136, and phase 1 and 2 single agents in 233.<br />Results: Eighty-six of the 673 patients (13%) achieved a complete response (CR) or a CR with low platelet count (CRp). The median duration of CR-CRp was 7.2 months. The median survival was 4.4 months (95% confidence interval, 4.0-4.8 months), and the 1-year survival rate was 16% (95% confidence interval, 14%-19%). Multivariate analysis identified the following as independent adverse factors for achievement of CR-CRp: platelets < 50 × 10 <superscript>9</superscript> /L (P < .001), complex karyotype with ≥3 chromosomal abnormalities (P = .02), regimens that did not include cytarabine or hypomethylating agents (P = .014), and no prior CR lasting ≥12 months with frontline or salvage 1 therapies (P < .001). The independent adverse factors associated with worse survival were age ≥60 years (P = .01), platelets < 50 × 10 <superscript>9</superscript> /L (P = .02), peripheral blasts ≥ 20% (P = .03), albumin ≤ 3 g/dL (P = .04), and complex karyotype (P = .003). The authors also applied and validated, in the current population, the 2 multivariate-derived prognostic models for CR and survival developed in their previous study of 594 patients who received treatment for second salvage AML from the previous 2 decades.<br />Conclusions: This large-scale analysis establishes the modern historic results of second salvage therapy in AML and validates the prognostic models associated with outcome. These data could be used to analyze the differential benefits of current or future investigational strategies under evaluation in this setting and for the purpose of potential approval of new agents in the United States and the world. Cancer 2018;124:2534-40. © 2018 American Cancer Society.<br /> (© 2018 American Cancer Society.)
- Subjects :
- Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols pharmacology
Clinical Trials as Topic
Cytarabine pharmacology
Cytarabine therapeutic use
DNA Methylation drug effects
Drug Resistance, Neoplasm drug effects
Drug Resistance, Neoplasm genetics
Female
Humans
Karyotype
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute genetics
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute mortality
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute pathology
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local genetics
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local mortality
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local pathology
Prognosis
Retreatment methods
Survival Analysis
Survival Rate
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute drug therapy
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local drug therapy
Remission Induction methods
Salvage Therapy methods
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1097-0142
- Volume :
- 124
- Issue :
- 12
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Cancer
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 29645075
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31370