Back to Search Start Over

Dual p16 and Ki-67 Expression in Liquid-Based Cervical Cytological Samples Compared to Pap Cytology Findings, Biopsies, and HPV Testing in Cervical Cancer Screening: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study.

Authors :
Prigenzi KCK
Heinke T
Salim RC
Focchi GRA
Source :
Acta cytologica [Acta Cytol] 2018; Vol. 62 (2), pp. 104-114. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Mar 22.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Objective: Our objective was to verify the sensitivity and specificity of dual immunocytochemistry staining for p16 and Ki-67 in liquid-based samples (the "dual" assay) for cervical lesion screening, compared to biopsy findings and human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA molecular detection.<br />Study Design: Sensitivity, specificity, and positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values for the "dual immunocytochemistry assay" were calculated and compared to histopathological results and to high-risk HPV DNA detection in adult women or teenagers submitted to cervical cancer screening.<br />Results: A total of 151 women were included. The majority (96.2%) of those with negative dual assay results had lower biopsy grades (p < 0.001). Women with cytology results suggestive of cervical cancer had positive dual immunocytochemistry assay results more frequently (p < 0.001), and these positive results were also significantly associated with biopsy findings (p < 0.001) and with high-risk genotype HPV infection (p = 0.007). Specificity and PPV for the dual assay were 0.972 (0.855-0.999) and 0.800 (0.284-0.995), respectively, and 1.000 (0.590-1.000) and 1.000 (0.631-1.000) for HPV detection.<br />Conclusions: The dual immunocytochemistry assay had high specificity and PPV. It reveals a persistent HPV infection, avoiding the need for new tissue collections for biopsies or hybrid capture.<br /> (© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1938-2650
Volume :
62
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Acta cytologica
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
29566392
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1159/000487504