Back to Search
Start Over
Evaluation of sedative and antinociceptive effects of dexmedetomidine, midazolam and dexmedetomidine-midazolam in tegus (Salvator merianae).
- Source :
-
Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia [Vet Anaesth Analg] 2018 May; Vol. 45 (3), pp. 320-328. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Jan 17. - Publication Year :
- 2018
-
Abstract
- Objective: To evaluate dexmedetomidine, midazolam and dexmedetomidine-midazolam for sedation and antinociception in tegus.<br />Study Design: Prospective, crossover, randomized, blinded study.<br />Animals: Six healthy tegus (Salvator merianae) weighing 1.6±0.3 kg.<br />Methods: Tegus were administered intramuscularly saline (0.5 mL; CON), dexmedetomidine (0.2 mg kg <superscript>-1</superscript> ; DX), midazolam (1 mg kg <superscript>-1</superscript> ; MZ) and dexmedetomidine-midazolam (same doses; DM). Heart rate (HR) and respiratory frequency (f <subscript>R</subscript> ) were recorded before treatment (baseline) and 15, 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hours after the treatments. Sedation scores were recorded according to resistance to manual restraint, posture and response to noxious stimulus, at baseline and 5, 10, 15, 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hours after the treatments. Antinociception was evaluated by measurement of latency of limb withdrawal reflex (LWR) to thermal stimulus, recorded at baseline and 15 minutes, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours after the treatments.<br />Results: Lower HR (DX and DM) and f <subscript>R</subscript> (MZ, DX and DM) than CON were measured 15 minutes after the treatment and for up to 6 hours. Sedation was mild to moderate in MZ, deep in DM and absent in DX, although animals showed behavioral changes in DX, with increase in aggressiveness. Median (interquartile range) duration of sedation were 170 (50; 235) minutes in MZ and 230 (115; 235) minutes in DM. Recovery period was prolonged in both treatments, surpassing the duration of the experiment. Higher LWR than CON was detected from 15 minutes until 12 hours in DX and DM.<br />Conclusions and Clinical Relevance: Midazolam provided sedation without antinociception, and dexmedetomidine provided antinociception without sedation. Drug combination increased the duration of sedation but not antinociception. Due to increased duration of sedation, reversal of effects with flumazenil and atipamezole should be considered after conclusion of clinical procedures.<br /> (Copyright © 2018 Association of Veterinary Anaesthetists and American College of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Analgesics administration & dosage
Animals
Deep Sedation methods
Deep Sedation veterinary
Dexmedetomidine administration & dosage
Drug Therapy, Combination
Hypnotics and Sedatives administration & dosage
Immobilization methods
Injections, Intramuscular veterinary
Midazolam administration & dosage
Pain Management methods
Analgesics pharmacology
Dexmedetomidine pharmacology
Hypnotics and Sedatives pharmacology
Immobilization veterinary
Lizards
Midazolam pharmacology
Pain Management veterinary
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1467-2995
- Volume :
- 45
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 29555147
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2017.12.004