Back to Search Start Over

[Use of Bronchial Blockers for Lung Isolation].

Authors :
Kreft T
Hachenberg T
Source :
Anasthesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin, Schmerztherapie : AINS [Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther] 2018 Mar; Vol. 53 (3), pp. 198-210. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Mar 19.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Traditionally the double-lumen-tube (DLT) is considered the gold standard for lung separation. Despite being equally feasible for standard situations, there are special populations and circumstances requiring the use of a bronchial blocker (BB) to establish one-lung ventilation. Children under 8 years of age and patients without a patent orotracheal airway necessitate the use of a bronchial blocker in most cases, as well as those requiring selective lobar blockade or a rapid sequence induction. Surgery with predicted postoperative mechanical ventilation or in tracheotomized patients at least favors their use by avoiding the complications of a tube exchange. Bronchial blocker models currently in clinical use include the wire-guided Arndt-Blocker, the Flexitip Cohen-Blocker, the Fuji Uniblocker, the Y-shaped EZ-Blocker and the tracheoscopy-guided VivaSight-EB. Their common concept is the occlusion of the operative lung by the inflation of their distal balloon, with the deflation of that lung occurring through their inner lumen. They mainly differ in their mode of placement. Bronchial blockers offer a clinical performance comparable to the DLT. Placement times for lung isolation devices and surgical exposure may depend more on the experience of the anaesthetist than the device itself. Bronchial blockers won't replace the DLT as gold standard at least due to their cost of acquisition, but provided adequate training outside of the emergency situation, their utilisation offers equal operative conditions at comparable placement times, dislocation rates and ease of use. A modern bronchial blocker should be available in institutions managing complex thoracic cases.<br />Competing Interests: Die Autoren erklären, dass keine Interessenkonflikte vorliegen.<br /> (Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Details

Language :
German
ISSN :
1439-1074
Volume :
53
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Anasthesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin, Schmerztherapie : AINS
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
29554712
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-114677