Back to Search Start Over

The perioperative outcomes between renal hilar and non-hilar tumors following robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN).

Authors :
Lu SY
Chung HJ
Huang EY
Lin TP
Lin ATL
Source :
Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA [J Chin Med Assoc] 2018 Aug; Vol. 81 (8), pp. 676-681. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Mar 15.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes between renal hilar tumors and non-hilar tumors after robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN).<br />Methods: A retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent RAPN from December 2009 to September 2015 at our institution was recruited. Perioperative outcomes including demographic characteristics, perioperative, pathological and renal function outcomes were compared between the hilar group (n = 30) and non-hilar group (n = 170).<br />Results: In characteristics, hilar group was younger (52.4 vs. 58 years, p = 0.04) and had less body mass index (23.7 vs. 25.4 kg/m <superscript>2</superscript> , p = 0.018). Hilar group had larger tumor size (4.8 vs. 3.7 cm, p = 0.009), higher Preoperative Aspects and Dimensions Used for an Anatomical (PADUA) score (10.7 vs. 8.5, p < 0.001) and higher RENAL (radius, exophytic/endophytic properties of the tumor, nearness of tumor deepest portion to the collecting system or sinus, anterior/posterior description and the location relative to polar lines) score (9.0 vs. 7.4, p < 0.001). Hilar tumor was associated with longer operative time (293.6 vs. 240.5 min, p = 0.001) and warm ischemia time (39.9 vs. 21.8 min, p < 0.001). But there was no statistically difference in estimated blood loss (EBL), postoperative stay and complication rate. For pathological outcomes, there was no difference of positive margin rate and pathological T stage between these groups. For renal function outcomes, hilar tumor patients had no difference of the change of creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at postoperative 6 and 12 month as compared with non-hilar tumor patients.<br />Conclusion: For renal hilar tumor, RAPN could provide acceptable results of perioperative, pathological and renal function outcome as compared with non-hilar tumor group. Thus RAPN is a safe and effective nephron-sparing surgery technique for renal hilar tumors.<br /> (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1728-7731
Volume :
81
Issue :
8
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
29551485
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcma.2017.11.014