Back to Search Start Over

Deep Learning for Prediction of Obstructive Disease From Fast Myocardial Perfusion SPECT: A Multicenter Study.

Authors :
Betancur J
Commandeur F
Motlagh M
Sharir T
Einstein AJ
Bokhari S
Fish MB
Ruddy TD
Kaufmann P
Sinusas AJ
Miller EJ
Bateman TM
Dorbala S
Di Carli M
Germano G
Otaki Y
Tamarappoo BK
Dey D
Berman DS
Slomka PJ
Source :
JACC. Cardiovascular imaging [JACC Cardiovasc Imaging] 2018 Nov; Vol. 11 (11), pp. 1654-1663. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Mar 14.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Objectives: The study evaluated the automatic prediction of obstructive disease from myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) by deep learning as compared with total perfusion deficit (TPD).<br />Background: Deep convolutional neural networks trained with a large multicenter population may provide improved prediction of per-patient and per-vessel coronary artery disease from single-photon emission computed tomography MPI.<br />Methods: A total of 1,638 patients (67% men) without known coronary artery disease, undergoing stress <superscript>99m</superscript> Tc-sestamibi or tetrofosmin MPI with new generation solid-state scanners in 9 different sites, with invasive coronary angiography performed within 6 months of MPI, were studied. Obstructive disease was defined as ≥70% narrowing of coronary arteries (≥50% for left main artery). Left ventricular myocardium was segmented using clinical nuclear cardiology software and verified by an expert reader. Stress TPD was computed using sex- and camera-specific normal limits. Deep learning was trained using raw and quantitative polar maps and evaluated for prediction of obstructive stenosis in a stratified 10-fold cross-validation procedure.<br />Results: A total of 1,018 (62%) patients and 1,797 of 4,914 (37%) arteries had obstructive disease. Area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for disease prediction by deep learning was higher than for TPD (per patient: 0.80 vs. 0.78; per vessel: 0.76 vs. 0.73: p < 0.01). With deep learning threshold set to the same specificity as TPD, per-patient sensitivity improved from 79.8% (TPD) to 82.3% (deep learning) (p < 0.05), and per-vessel sensitivity improved from 64.4% (TPD) to 69.8% (deep learning) (p < 0.01).<br />Conclusions: Deep learning has the potential to improve automatic interpretation of MPI as compared with current clinical methods.<br /> (Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1876-7591
Volume :
11
Issue :
11
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
JACC. Cardiovascular imaging
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
29550305
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.01.020