Back to Search Start Over

The independent effect of emergency general surgery on outcomes varies depending on case type: A NSQIP outcomes study.

Authors :
Feeney T
Castillo-Angeles M
Scott JW
Nitzschke SL
Salim A
Haider AH
Havens JM
Source :
American journal of surgery [Am J Surg] 2018 Nov; Vol. 216 (5), pp. 856-862. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Mar 07.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Background: Emergency general surgery (EGS) is an independent risk factor for morbidity and mortality, and seven procedures account for 80% of the National burden of operative EGS. We aimed to characterize the excess morbidity and mortality attributable to these procedures based on the level of procedural risk.<br />Methods: Retrospective analysis of the ACS National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (ACS-NSQIP) database. (2005-2014). Seven EGS procedures were stratified as high risk and low risk. Primary outcomes were overall mortality, overall morbidity, major morbidity. Multivariable logistic regression was performed.<br />Results: There were 619,174 patients identified. Comparing EGS to non-EGS in high-risk cases the OR for overall mortality was 1.39(1.33,1.45), overall morbidity 1.07 (0.98, 1.16), and major morbidity 1.15(1.03,1,27). In low-risk cases the OR for overall mortality was 1.03 (0.89, 1.19) overall morbidity 1.35 (1.23, 1.48), and major morbidity 2.18(1.90, 2.50).<br />Conclusions: Using a Nationally representative clinical database we identified significant heterogeneity in the outcomes of EGS depending on procedural risk. Risk stratification and benchmarking strategies need to account for the inherent heterogeneity of EGS.<br /> (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1879-1883
Volume :
216
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
American journal of surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
29534818
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.03.006