Restrictive Versus Massive Fluid Resuscitation Strategy (REFILL study), influence on blood loss and hemostatic parameters in obstetric hemorrhage: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

MLA

de Lange, Natascha, et al. “Restrictive Versus Massive Fluid Resuscitation Strategy (REFILL Study), Influence on Blood Loss and Hemostatic Parameters in Obstetric Hemorrhage: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.” Trials, vol. 19, no. 1, Mar. 2018, p. 166. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2512-z.

APA

de Lange, N., Schol, P., Lancé, M., Woiski, M., Langenveld, J., Rijnders, R., Smits, L., Wassen, M., Henskens, Y., & Scheepers, H. (2018). Restrictive Versus Massive Fluid Resuscitation Strategy (REFILL study), influence on blood loss and hemostatic parameters in obstetric hemorrhage: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials, 19(1), 166. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2512-z

Chicago

de Lange, Natascha, Pim Schol, Marcus Lancé, Mallory Woiski, Josje Langenveld, Robbert Rijnders, Luc Smits, Martine Wassen, Yvonne Henskens, and Hubertina Scheepers. 2018. “Restrictive Versus Massive Fluid Resuscitation Strategy (REFILL Study), Influence on Blood Loss and Hemostatic Parameters in Obstetric Hemorrhage: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.” Trials 19 (1): 166. doi:10.1186/s13063-018-2512-z.