Back to Search Start Over

Phase II Trial of High-Dose Gemcitabine/Busulfan/Melphalan with Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Primary Refractory or Poor-Risk Relapsed Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Authors :
Nieto Y
Thall PF
Ma J
Valdez BC
Ahmed S
Anderlini P
Popat U
Jones RB
Shpall EJ
Hosing C
Qazilbash M
Kebriaei P
Alousi A
Timmons M
Gulbis A
Myers A
Oki Y
Fanale M
Dabaja B
Pinnix C
Milgrom S
Champlin R
Andersson BS
Source :
Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation [Biol Blood Marrow Transplant] 2018 Aug; Vol. 24 (8), pp. 1602-1609. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Mar 02.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

We conducted a prospective phase 2 trial of gemcitabine, busulfan and melphalan (Gem/Bu/Mel) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with primary refractory or poor-risk relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) (ie, extranodal relapse or within 1 year of frontline therapy). The trial was powered to detect an improvement in 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) from a historical 50% using a BEAM regimen (carmustine/etoposide/cytarabine/melphalan) to 65%. We compared the study population with all other concurrent patients who were eligible for the trial but instead received the BEAM regimen at our center. No patient received post-ASCT maintenance therapy. The Gem/Bu/Mel trial enrolled 80 patients with a median age of 31 years, 41% with primary refractory HL and 59% with relapsed HL (36% extranodal relapses), and 30% with positron emission tomography (PET)-positive lesions at ASCT. The concurrent BEAM (n = 45) and Gem/Bu/Mel cohorts were well balanced except for higher rates of bulky relapse and PET-positive tumors in the Gem/Bu/Mel cohort. There were no transplantation-related deaths in either cohort. At a median follow-up of 34.5 months (range, 26 to 72 months), Gem/Bu/Mel was associated with better 2-year PFS (65% versus 51%; P = .008) and overall survival (89% versus 73%; P = .0003). In conclusion, our data show that Gem/Bu/Mel is safe, in this nonrandomized comparison yielding improved outcomes compared with a concurrently treated and prognostically matched cohort of patients with primary refractory or poor-risk relapsed HL receiving BEAM.<br /> (Copyright © 2018 The American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1523-6536
Volume :
24
Issue :
8
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
29501779
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.02.020