Back to Search Start Over

High Tumor Volume to Fetal Weight Ratio Is Associated with Worse Fetal Outcomes and Increased Maternal Risk in Fetuses with Sacrococcygeal Teratoma.

Authors :
Gebb JS
Khalek N
Qamar H
Johnson MP
Oliver ER
Coleman BG
Peranteau WH
Hedrick HL
Flake AW
Adzick NS
Moldenhauer JS
Source :
Fetal diagnosis and therapy [Fetal Diagn Ther] 2019; Vol. 45 (2), pp. 94-101. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Mar 01.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Objective: Tumor volume to fetal weight ratio (TFR) > 0.12 before 24 weeks has been associated with poor outcome in fetuses with sacrococcygeal teratoma (SCT). We evaluated TFR in predicting poor fetal outcome and increased maternal operative risk in our cohort of SCT pregnancies.<br />Methods: This is a retrospective, single-center review of fetuses seen with SCT from 1997 to 2015. Patients who chose termination of pregnancy (TOP), delivered elsewhere, or had initial evaluation at > 24 weeks were excluded. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis determined the optimal TFR to predict poor fetal outcome and increased maternal operative risk. Poor fetal outcome included fetal demise, neonatal demise, or fetal deterioration warranting open fetal surgery or delivery < 32 weeks. Increased maternal operative risk included cases necessitating open fetal surgery, classical cesarean delivery, or ex utero intrapartum treatment (EXIT).<br />Results: Of 139 pregnancies with SCT, 27 chose TOP, 14 delivered elsewhere, and 40 had initial evaluation at > 24 weeks. Thus, 58 fetuses were reviewed. ROC analysis revealed that at ≤24 weeks, TFR > 0.095 was predictive of poor fetal outcome and TFR > 0.12 was predictive of increased maternal operative risk.<br />Conclusion: This study supports the use of TFR at ≤24 weeks for risk stratification of pregnancies with SCT.<br /> (© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1421-9964
Volume :
45
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Fetal diagnosis and therapy
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
29495013
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1159/000486782