Back to Search Start Over

Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines to identify recommendations for rehabilitation after stroke and other acquired brain injuries.

Authors :
Jolliffe L
Lannin NA
Cadilhac DA
Hoffmann T
Source :
BMJ open [BMJ Open] 2018 Feb 28; Vol. 8 (2), pp. e018791. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Feb 28.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Objectives: Rehabilitation clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) contain recommendation statements aimed at optimising care for adults with stroke and other brain injury. The aim of this study was to determine the quality, scope and consistency of CPG recommendations for rehabilitation covering the acquired brain injury populations.<br />Design: Systematic review.<br />Interventions: Included CPGs contained recommendations for inpatient rehabilitation or community rehabilitation for adults with an acquired brain injury diagnosis (stroke, traumatic or other non-progressive acquired brain impairments). Electronic databases (n=2), guideline organisations (n=4) and websites of professional societies (n=17) were searched up to November 2017. Two independent reviewers used the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument, and textual syntheses were used to appraise and compare recommendations.<br />Results: From 427 papers screened, 20 guidelines met the inclusion criteria. Only three guidelines were rated high (>75%) across all domains of AGREE-II; highest rated domains were 'scope and purpose' (85.1, SD 18.3) and 'clarity' (76.2%, SD 20.5). Recommendations for assessment and for motor therapies were most commonly reported, however, varied in the level of detail across guidelines.<br />Conclusion: Rehabilitation CPGs were consistent in scope, suggesting little difference in rehabilitation approaches between vascular and traumatic brain injury. There was, however, variability in included studies and methodological quality.<br />Prospero Registration Number: CRD42016026936.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: NAL, TH and DAC have been involved in the development of clinical practice guidelines referenced in this paper. They have also authored papers (randomised controlled trials) cited within the body of the guidelines that this systematic review appraised.<br /> (© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2044-6055
Volume :
8
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
BMJ open
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
29490958
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018791