Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of image quality and radiation dose between split-filter dual-energy images and single-energy images in single-source abdominal CT.

Authors :
Euler A
Obmann MM
Szucs-Farkas Z
Mileto A
Zaehringer C
Falkowski AL
Winkel DJ
Marin D
Stieltjes B
Krauss B
Schindera ST
Source :
European radiology [Eur Radiol] 2018 Aug; Vol. 28 (8), pp. 3405-3412. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Feb 19.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Objectives: To compare image quality and radiation dose of abdominal split-filter dual-energy CT (SF-DECT) combined with monoenergetic imaging to single-energy CT (SECT) with automatic tube voltage selection (ATVS).<br />Methods: Two-hundred single-source abdominal CT scans were performed as SECT with ATVS (n = 100) and SF-DECT (n = 100). SF-DECT scans were reconstructed and subdivided into composed images (SF-CI) and monoenergetic images at 55 keV (SF-MI). Objective and subjective image quality were compared among single-energy images (SEI), SF-CI and SF-MI. CNR and FOM were separately calculated for the liver (e.g. CNR <subscript>liv</subscript> ) and the portal vein (CNR <subscript>pv</subscript> ). Radiation dose was compared using size-specific dose estimate (SSDE). Results of the three groups were compared using non-parametric tests.<br />Results: Image noise of SF-CI was 18% lower compared to SEI and 48% lower compared to SF-MI (p < 0.001). Composed images yielded higher CNR <subscript>liv</subscript> over single-energy images (23.4 vs. 20.9; p < 0.001), whereas CNR <subscript>pv</subscript> was significantly lower (3.5 vs. 5.2; p < 0.001). Monoenergetic images overcame this inferiority in CNR <subscript>pv</subscript> and achieved similar results compared to single-energy images (5.1 vs. 5.2; p > 0.628). Subjective sharpness was equal between single-energy and monoenergetic images and diagnostic confidence was equal between single-energy and composed images. FOM <subscript>liv</subscript> was highest for SF-CI. FOM <subscript>pv</subscript> was equal for SEI and SF-MI (p = 0.78). SSDE was significant lower for SF-DECT compared to SECT (p < 0.022).<br />Conclusions: The combined use of split-filter dual-energy CT images provides comparable objective and subjective image quality at lower radiation dose compared to single-energy CT with ATVS.<br />Key Points: • Split-filter dual-energy results in 18% lower noise compared to single-energy with ATVS. • Split-filter dual-energy results in 11% lower SSDE compared to single-energy with ATVS. • Spectral shaping of split-filter dual-energy leads to an increased dose-efficiency.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1432-1084
Volume :
28
Issue :
8
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
European radiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
29460070
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5338-x