Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of quantitative T 2 and ADC mapping in the assessment of 3-nitropropionic acid-induced neurotoxicity in rats.

Authors :
Liachenko S
Ramu J
Paule MG
Hanig J
Source :
Neurotoxicology [Neurotoxicology] 2018 Mar; Vol. 65, pp. 52-59. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Feb 07.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

To assess the relative performance of MRI T <subscript>2</subscript> relaxation and ADC mapping as potential biomarkers of neurotoxicity, a model of 3-nitropropionic acid (NP)-induced neurodegeneration in rats was employed. Male Sprague-Dawley rats received NP (N = 20, 16-20 mg/kg, ip or sc) or saline (N = 6, 2 ml/kg, ip) daily for 3 days. MRI was performed using a 7 T system employing quantitative T <subscript>2</subscript> and ADC mapping based on spin echo pulse sequence. All maps were skull stripped and co-registered and the changes were quantified using baseline subtraction and anatomical segmentation. Following the in vivo portion of the study, rat brains were histologically examined. Four NP-treated rats were considered responders based on their MRI and histology data. T <subscript>2</subscript> values always increased in the presence of toxicity, while ADC changes were bidirectional, decreasing in some lesion areas and increasing in others. In contrast to T <subscript>2</subscript> in some cases, ADC did not change. The effect sizes of T <subscript>2</subscript> and ADC signals suggestive of neurotoxicity were 2.64 and 1.66, respectively, and the variability of averaged T <subscript>2</subscript> values among anatomical regions was consistently lower than that for ADC. The histopathology data confirmed the presence of neurotoxicity, however, a more detailed assessment of the correlation of MRI with histology is needed. T <subscript>2</subscript> mapping provides more sensitive and specific information than ADC about changes in the rat brain thought to be associated with neurotoxicity due to a higher signal-to-noise ratio, better resolution, and unidirectional changes, and presents a better opportunity for biomarker development.<br /> (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1872-9711
Volume :
65
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Neurotoxicology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
29427612
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2018.02.004