Back to Search Start Over

In which context is physician empathy associated with cancer patient quality of life?

Authors :
Lelorain S
Cattan S
Lordick F
Mehnert A
Mariette C
Christophe V
Cortot A
Source :
Patient education and counseling [Patient Educ Couns] 2018 Jul; Vol. 101 (7), pp. 1216-1222. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Feb 01.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Objective: In cancer settings, physician empathy is not always linked to a better patient emotional quality of life quality of life (eQoL). We tested two possible moderators of the inconsistent link: type of consultation (bad news versus follow-up) and patient emotional skills (emoSkills, i.e., the way patients process emotional information).<br />Methods: In a cross-sectional design, 296 thoracic and digestive tract cancer patients completed validated questionnaires to assess their physician empathy, their emoSkills and eQoL. Moderated multiple regressions were performed.<br />Results: In follow-up consultations, physician empathy was associated with a better eQoL in patients with low or average emotional skills. Those with high emotional skills did not benefit from physician empathy. Their eQoL was nonetheless very good. In bad news consultations, the pattern was reversed: only patients with average or high emotional skills benefited from physician empathy. Those with low emotional skills were not sensitive to it and presented a poor eQoL.<br />Conclusion: Medical empathy is important in all consultations. However, in bad news consultations, patients with low emoSkills are at risk of psychological distress even with an empathetic doctor.<br />Practice Implications: Accordingly, physicians should be trained to detect patients with low emoSkills in order to refer them to supportive care.<br /> (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1873-5134
Volume :
101
Issue :
7
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Patient education and counseling
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
29409676
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2018.01.023